Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Jan Beulich
On 21.03.2023 15:51, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/03/2023 9:24 am, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 17.03.2023 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >> O

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 21/03/2023 3:59 pm, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:51:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 20/03/2023 9:24 am, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 17.03.2023 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.05.2020 17:01, An

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Jan Beulich
On 21.03.2023 16:58, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 21.03.2023 15:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. Signed-o

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:51:30PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 20/03/2023 9:24 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 17.03.2023 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/05/2020 14:35, Ja

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 21.03.2023 15:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > >> > >> --- a/xen/arch/x8

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Jan Beulich
On 21.03.2023 15:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct pla

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/03/2023 9:24 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.03.2023 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> O

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-21 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init g > case 0x000506e0: /*

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-20 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.03.2023 12:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Res

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2023-03-17 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:40:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >>> On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: > Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2020-05-26 Thread Jan Beulich
On 26.05.2020 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2020-05-26 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 26/05/2020 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >>> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >>> @@ -6045,6

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2020-05-26 Thread Jan Beulich
On 26.05.2020 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c >> @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init

Re: [PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2020-05-26 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 26/05/2020 07:49, Jan Beulich wrote: > Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init g > case 0x000506e0: /* errata SKL167 / SKW159

[PATCH] x86: extend coverage of HLE "bad page" workaround

2020-05-25 Thread Jan Beulich
Respective Core Gen10 processor lines are affected, too. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -6045,6 +6045,8 @@ const struct platform_bad_page *__init g case 0x000506e0: /* errata SKL167 / SKW159 */ case 0x000806e0: /* erratum KBL??? */ ca