On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.06.2023 19:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> This should be static, and there's no need for a separate (non-init, even)
>> function to perform a simple equality test. Drop the is_ prefix which is
>> gramatically questionable, and make it __ro_after_init.
On 20.06.2023 19:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This should be static, and there's no need for a separate (non-init, even)
> function to perform a simple equality test. Drop the is_ prefix which is
> gramatically questionable, and make it __ro_after_init.
>
> Leave a TODO, because the behaviour is de
This should be static, and there's no need for a separate (non-init, even)
function to perform a simple equality test. Drop the is_ prefix which is
gramatically questionable, and make it __ro_after_init.
Leave a TODO, because the behaviour is definitely wrong to be applied to ~all
modern Intel CP
