On 11/30/22 02:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.11.2022 21:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/11/2022 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
Plus, as a minor benefit, the gen
On 30/11/2022 07:52, Jan Beulich wrote:On 29.11.2022 21:56, Andrew
Cooper wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
>>> the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
>>> Plus, as a minor bene
On 29.11.2022 21:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
>> the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
>> Plus, as a minor benefit, the general reference count can be one
On 29/11/2022 20:56, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
>> the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
>> Plus, as a minor benefit, the general reference count can be one
On 29/11/2022 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
> the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
> Plus, as a minor benefit, the general reference count can be one bit
> wider. (To simplify things, have PGC_pag
By defining the constant to zero when !SHADOW_PAGING we give compilers
the chance to eliminate a little more dead code elsewhere in the tree.
Plus, as a minor benefit, the general reference count can be one bit
wider. (To simplify things, have PGC_page_table change places with
PGC_extra.)
Signed-o
