On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.10.2023 17:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:30:37PM +0200, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
> >> Do not use emuirq mappings for MSIs injected by emulated devices.
> >> This kind of pirq shares the same emuirq value and is not remapped.
On 31.10.2023 17:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:30:37PM +0200, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
>> Do not use emuirq mappings for MSIs injected by emulated devices.
>> This kind of pirq shares the same emuirq value and is not remapped.
>
> AFAICT adding the extra emuirq mappings is
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:30:37PM +0200, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
> Do not use emuirq mappings for MSIs injected by emulated devices.
> This kind of pirq shares the same emuirq value and is not remapped.
AFAICT adding the extra emuirq mappings is harmless, and just adds
an extra layer of translati
Do not use emuirq mappings for MSIs injected by emulated devices.
This kind of pirq shares the same emuirq value and is not remapped.
Fixes: 88fccdd11ca0 ('xen: event channel remapping for emulated MSIs')
Signed-off-by: Xenia Ragiadakou
---
Question: is there any strong reason why Linux HVM gues