On 20.03.2024 12:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/03/2024 8:12 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.03.2024 18:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> It occurs to me that I need this hunk too.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py b/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
>>> index 25d329ce486f..bf3f9ec01e6e 100755
>>> ---
On 20/03/2024 8:12 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.03.2024 18:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> It occurs to me that I need this hunk too.
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py b/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
>> index 25d329ce486f..bf3f9ec01e6e 100755
>> --- a/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
>> +++ b/xen/tools/gen-cp
On 19.03.2024 18:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> It occurs to me that I need this hunk too.
>
> diff --git a/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py b/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
> index 25d329ce486f..bf3f9ec01e6e 100755
> --- a/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
> +++ b/xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py
> @@ -329,6 +329,10 @@ def crunch_numbers(
On 19.03.2024 18:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 19/03/2024 1:11 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.03.2024 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.03.2024 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
name of FAST_REP_SCASB.
>>> With FSRS a
On 18/03/2024 6:13 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> All of these are informational and require no further logic changes in Xen to
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Roger Pau Monné
>
> I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
> n
On 19/03/2024 1:11 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.03.2024 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.03.2024 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
>>> name of FAST_REP_SCASB.
>> With FSRS already used, I guess that's the closest we can ge
On 19.03.2024 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.03.2024 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
>> name of FAST_REP_SCASB.
>
> With FSRS already used, I guess that's the closest we can get to keep
> names for similar features simila
On 18.03.2024 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
> name of FAST_REP_SCASB.
With FSRS already used, I guess that's the closest we can get to keep
names for similar features similar.
> --- a/tools/misc/xen-cpuid.c
> +++ b/tools/m
All of these are informational and require no further logic changes in Xen to
support.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Roger Pau Monné
I'm not sure about FSRSC as a name, but it definitely beats AMD's longhand
name of FAST_REP_SCASB.
---
tools/misc/xen-cpuid.c