On 17.08.2021 12:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 09:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.08.2021 21:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 16/08/2021 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
and an apparently wrong comment stating
that not only v_end but also v_start would be superpage aligned
>>> Which co
On 17/08/2021 09:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.08.2021 21:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 16/08/2021 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> About every time I look at dom0_construct_pv()'s "calculation" of
>>> nr_pt_pages I question (myself) whether the result is precise or merely
>>> an upper bound. I thin
On 16.08.2021 21:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/08/2021 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> About every time I look at dom0_construct_pv()'s "calculation" of
>> nr_pt_pages I question (myself) whether the result is precise or merely
>> an upper bound. I think it is meant to be precise, but I think we wo
On 16/08/2021 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> About every time I look at dom0_construct_pv()'s "calculation" of
> nr_pt_pages I question (myself) whether the result is precise or merely
> an upper bound. I think it is meant to be precise, but I think we would
> be better off having some checking in pla
About every time I look at dom0_construct_pv()'s "calculation" of
nr_pt_pages I question (myself) whether the result is precise or merely
an upper bound. I think it is meant to be precise, but I think we would
be better off having some checking in place. Hence add ASSERT()s to
verify that
- all pag
