Re: [PATCH] x86/IO-APIC: correct RET polarity comment

2023-12-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 19/12/2023 1:51 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.12.2023 14:49, Jan Beulich wrote: >> The comment there was the wrong way round, documentation clearly states >> that 0 is high and 1 is low. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > And of course in the title s/RET/RTE/. Acked-by: Andrew Cooper

Re: [PATCH] x86/IO-APIC: correct RET polarity comment

2023-12-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.12.2023 14:49, Jan Beulich wrote: > The comment there was the wrong way round, documentation clearly states > that 0 is high and 1 is low. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich And of course in the title s/RET/RTE/. Jan > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm

[PATCH] x86/IO-APIC: correct RET polarity comment

2023-12-19 Thread Jan Beulich
The comment there was the wrong way round, documentation clearly states that 0 is high and 1 is low. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct IO_APIC_route_entry {