On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:14 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.12.2024 16:12, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> >>> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Fields of anonymous
On 10.12.2024 16:12, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
rather
On Tue Dec 10, 2024 at 2:34 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
> >> rather old gcc.
> >
> > Can you add the specific versi
On 10.12.2024 15:25, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
>> rather old gcc.
>
> Can you add the specific version for tracking purposes?
It's all the same as before, and I reall
On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 3:13 PM GMT, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
> rather old gcc.
Can you add the specific version for tracking purposes?
>
> Fixes: 49a068471d77 ("x86/fpu: Rework fpu_setup_fpu() uses to split it in
> two")
> Signe
Fields of anonymous structs/unions may not be part of an initializer for
rather old gcc.
Fixes: 49a068471d77 ("x86/fpu: Rework fpu_setup_fpu() uses to split it in two")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
@@ -306,13 +306,13 @@ void vcpu_reset_fpu(struct
