On 19.01.2021 12:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:16:06AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 19/01/2021 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:48:37PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/01/2021 17:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:16:06AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 19/01/2021 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:48:37PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 18/01/2021 17:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 19/01/2021 11:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:48:37PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/01/2021 17:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.01.2021 16:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:48:37PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/01/2021 17:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 18.01.2021 16:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On
On 18/01/2021 17:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.01.2021 16:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.01.2021 16:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> >>> @@ -10
On 18.01.2021 16:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> This is a revert of f5cfa0985673 plus a rework of the comment that
>>> accompanies the setting of the flag so we don't forget why it needs to
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > This is a revert of f5cfa0985673 plus a rework of the comment that
> > accompanies the setting of the flag so we don't forget why it needs to
> > be unconditionally set: it's indicating wh
On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> This is a revert of f5cfa0985673 plus a rework of the comment that
> accompanies the setting of the flag so we don't forget why it needs to
> be unconditionally set: it's indicating whether the version of Xen has
> the original issue fixed and IOMMU ent
On 15.01.2021 16:01, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> This is a revert of f5cfa0985673 plus a rework of the comment that
> accompanies the setting of the flag so we don't forget why it needs to
> be unconditionally set: it's indicating whether the version of Xen has
> the original issue fixed and IOMMU ent
This is a revert of f5cfa0985673 plus a rework of the comment that
accompanies the setting of the flag so we don't forget why it needs to
be unconditionally set: it's indicating whether the version of Xen has
the original issue fixed and IOMMU entries are created for
grant/foreign maps.
Signed-off
11 matches
Mail list logo