On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:39:03AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> [...]
> Taking a step back, I think this series is very close to going in, if
> not actually ready. Do you have a git branch version of this ?
Actually no. I'm not used to git, and I find it quite hard to use
(and is a large part of t
Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:03:04PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > How about I write a patch splitting the relevant part up into a
> > version for systems with setresuid and systems with
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:03:04PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> setresuid()"):
> > Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> > setresuid()"):
> > >
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> setresuid()"):
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:10:36PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > My last m
Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:10:36PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > My last mail had in it a thing that claims to be a proof that this is
> > not possible.
>
> This code:
&g
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:10:36PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> setresuid()"):
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:32:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Yes, the dm is qemu. If qemu restricti
Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:32:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Yes, the dm is qemu. If qemu restriction is not supported, that makes
> > a big difference. The complex situation her
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:32:29PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> setresuid()"):
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:52:06PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I don't think setuid is safe - at
Manuel Bouyer writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:52:06PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I don't think setuid is safe - at least, if we are trying to restrict
> > the dm. Since I think after the libxl c
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:52:06PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
> setresuid()"):
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:12:36PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > From: Manuel Bouyer
> > >
>
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH] libs/light: make it build without
setresuid()"):
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:12:36PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > From: Manuel Bouyer
> >
> > NetBSD doesn't have setresuid(). Add a configure check for it,
> >
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:12:36PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> From: Manuel Bouyer
>
> NetBSD doesn't have setresuid(). Add a configure check for it,
> and use plain setuid() if !HAVE_SETRESUID
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Bouyer
LGTM from a code PoV, but I think George/Ian should take a look,
From: Manuel Bouyer
NetBSD doesn't have setresuid(). Add a configure check for it,
and use plain setuid() if !HAVE_SETRESUID
Signed-off-by: Manuel Bouyer
---
tools/configure | 13 +
tools/configure.ac | 3 +++
tools/libs/light/libxl_dm.c | 10 ++
3 fil
13 matches
Mail list logo
