On 04.09.2020 23:03, Sergei Temerkhanov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 04.09.2020 01:24, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> @@ -1521,7 +1521,9 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
>>
>> Looking at the
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 04.09.2020 01:24, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > @@ -1521,7 +1521,9 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
>
> Looking at the line numbers - is this patch against the master
> or
On 04.09.2020 01:24, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> @@ -1521,7 +1521,9 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
Looking at the line numbers - is this patch against the master
or staging branch? I ask because about as far away from the line
numbe
This helps overcome problems observed with some UEFI implementations
which don't set the Attributes field in memery descriptors properly
Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov
---
xen/common/efi/boot.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/