On 27/04/2022 14:51, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Bertrand,
On 27 Apr 2022, at 14:22, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
As part of XSA-385, SUPPORT.MD gained a statement regarding the amount
of physical memory supported.
However, booting Xen on a Arm platform with that amou
Hi Julien,
> On 27 Apr 2022, at 14:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> From: Julien Grall
>
> As part of XSA-385, SUPPORT.MD gained a statement regarding the amount
> of physical memory supported.
>
> However, booting Xen on a Arm platform with that amount of memory would
> result to a breakage becau
Hi Jan,
On 27/04/2022 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.04.2022 15:22, Julien Grall wrote:
--- a/SUPPORT.md
+++ b/SUPPORT.md
@@ -50,9 +50,10 @@ For the Cortex A57 r0p0 - r1p1, see Errata 832075.
### Physical Memory
-Status: Supported up to 8 TiB
-
-Hosts with more memory are supporte
On 27.04.2022 15:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> --- a/SUPPORT.md
> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
> @@ -50,9 +50,10 @@ For the Cortex A57 r0p0 - r1p1, see Errata 832075.
>
> ### Physical Memory
>
> -Status: Supported up to 8 TiB
> -
> -Hosts with more memory are supported, but not security supported.
> +
From: Julien Grall
As part of XSA-385, SUPPORT.MD gained a statement regarding the amount
of physical memory supported.
However, booting Xen on a Arm platform with that amount of memory would
result to a breakage because the frametable area is too small.
The wiki [1] (as of April 2022) claims w
