On 19/01/2021 13:20, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:45:18AM +, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> index 1f81eee..4175a2f 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenP
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 03:45:18AM +, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> index 1f81eee..4175a2f 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei/MemDetect.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ GetFi
On 01/11/21 04:45, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> We faced a problem with passing through a PCI device with 64GB BAR to UEFI
> guest. The BAR is expectedly programmed into 64-bit PCI aperture at
> 64G address which pushes physical address space to 37 bits. That is above
> 36-bit width that OVMF exposes cu
We faced a problem with passing through a PCI device with 64GB BAR to UEFI
guest. The BAR is expectedly programmed into 64-bit PCI aperture at
64G address which pushes physical address space to 37 bits. That is above
36-bit width that OVMF exposes currently to a guest without tweaking
PcdPciMmio64S