On Fri, March 9, 2018 12:04 pm, George Dunlap wrote:
> I'm all for encouraging people to jump into Xen, but I agree with
> Andre here, that you should really count the cost. I doubt this is
> the sort of thing a single person could really write and maintain unpaid on
> evenings and weekends. Rem
On Fri, March 9, 2018 11:24 am, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> If you are serious about it, you need a team. Which is about to stay
> around! At least two people, who both know the architecture *and* Xen well.
> And it will probably take them more than a year to get something
> into a state where you c
On Fri, March 9, 2018 11:25 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I expect that once the ball is rolling, it will pick up momentum, given
> the interest I've already seen on IRC. You probably want to hang out on
> freenode #xendevel
Thanks again for your and the other replies.
I have some hardware already
On Fri, March 9, 2018 10:03 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 09:37, awokd wrote:
>
> Xen currently has x86 and ARM as supported architectures, so there is a
> reasonable split between common and arch-specific code. As a start, you'd
> need to implement enough of th
Specifically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POWER9.
Qubes user here. Due to the ongoing manufacturer lock-down of the x86
arch. and security vulnerabilities introduced by same, I'm looking into
hardware alternatives. One promising candidate appears to be the POWER
architecture.
What would it take
