On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 05:23 +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > When using AMD-VI interrupt remapping the vector field in the IO-APIC RTE is
> > repurposed to contain part of the offset into the remapping table.
> > Previ
On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 23:24 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> This patch makes legacy backends optional. As was discussed at [1]
> this is a solution to a problem when we can't run QEMU as a device
> model in a non-privileged domain. This is because legacy backends
> assume that they are always run
On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 23:49 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>
> I can just pull it from this link, if you don't mind.
Please do; thank you!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Amazon Development Centre (London) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales with
registration number
On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 17:03 +, Paul Durrant wrote:
>
> > This patch checks presence of xendev->backend to check if Xen PV
> > device is acting as a backend (i.e. it was configured by Xen
>
> Technally *all* XenDevice objects are backends.
Right. The key criterion is whether the backend was c
On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 17:05 +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> On 21/11/2023 22:10, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse
> >
> > This allows a XenDevice implementation to know whether it was created
> > by QEMU, or merely discovered in XenStore after the toolstack created
> > it. This wil
On 13 Nov 2023 10:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Per commit f17068c1c7 ("xen-hvm: reorganize xen-hvm and move common
function to xen-hvm-common"), handle_ioreq() is expected to be
target-agnostic. However it uses 'target_ulong', which is a target
specific definition.
In order to compile this
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 17:06 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> After Commit 3499ba8198cad ("xen: Fix event channel callback via
> INTX/GSI"), xenbus_probe() will be called too early on Arm. This will
> recent to a guest hang during boot.
>
> If there hang wasn't there, we would
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 16:12 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> (+David)
>
> On 26/02/2020 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 26.02.2020 15:05, Durrant, Paul wrote:
> > > > From: Jan Beulich
> > > > Sent: 26 February 2020 13:58
> > > >
> > > > On 25.02.2020 10:53, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > > There's no
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 13:15 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > I'd much rather see the original patch reverted. The current size of
> > > struct domain with lockprofile enabled is 3200 bytes.
> >
> > Let me have a look first to see when/why struct domain is less than 4K
> > with lockprofile.
>
>
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 12:40 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
> > Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
> > (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
> > event channel ABI has implications for h
Adding Stefan to Cc.
Should we take this to the spexen or another mailing list?
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:55 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is an accumulation and summary of various tasks which have been
> > discusse
ne 18, 2018 2:43 PM
> To: Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; sstabell...@kernel.org; jbeulich@
> suse.com; andrew.coop...@citrix.com; Woodhouse, David
> Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-xen-traditional] xen/pt: allow QEMU to
> request MSI unmasking at bind time
>
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 11:46 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 11/07/18 11:15, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 13:09 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > >
> > > There is no need to set the same capabilities for each cpu
> > > individu
On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 13:09 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There is no need to set the same capabilities for each cpu
> individually. This can easily be done for all cpus when starting the
> kernel.
>
> Upstream commit: 0808e80cb760de2733c0527d2090ed2205a1eef8 ("xen: set
> cpu capabilities from xen
On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 11:46 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:33:22AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >
> > On 30/05/18 10:33, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:11:36PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Commit 944e0fc51a89c9827b98813d65dc083274777c7f
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:12 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> + * Squash the domid and vcpu id together for comparason
*comparison
> + * efficiency. We could in principle stash and compare the
> struct
> + * vcpu pointer, but this risks a false alias if a domain
16 matches
Mail list logo
