Re: [BUG] Assertion failure with vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif in nested SVM

2025-04-21 Thread REIMA ISHII
or if there are any plans for addressing this case in future releases. Since this issue can potentially cause a hypervisor panic, I believe it would be valuable to handle this safely. Thank you for your time On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:36 PM Reima ISHII wrote: > > Hi Xen Development Tea

Re: [BUG] Nested Virtualization Bug on x86-64 AMD CPU

2025-04-21 Thread REIMA ISHII
6, 2023 at 12:05 PM Reima ISHII wrote: > Thank you for your prompt response. > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:43 PM Andrew Cooper > wrote: > > Who is still in 64-bit mode ? > > > > It is legal for a 64-bit L1 to VMRUN into a 32-bit L2 with PG=0. > > > > But

Re: [BUG] Nested Virtualization Bug on x86-64 AMD CPU

2023-12-05 Thread Reima ISHII
larly considering Xen's current lack of AVIC support. > But, is this by any chance all running nested under KVM in your fuzzer? No, KVM was not used. The issue was observed on a Xen hypervisor's domU HVM running directly on the hardware. Within the guest HVM, a simple custom hypervisor was

[BUG] Nested Virtualization Bug on x86-64 AMD CPU

2023-12-05 Thread Reima ISHII
) (XEN) (XEN) Panic on CPU 10: (XEN) Xen BUG at arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c:983 (XEN) (XEN) -- Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo Reima Ishii ish...@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp

[BUG] Assertion failure with vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif in nested SVM

2023-11-12 Thread Reima ISHII
anic on CPU 2: (XEN) Assertion 'vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif == 0' failed at arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c:799 (XEN) Thanks, -- Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo Reima Ishii ish...@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp