Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-25 Thread Nick Desaulniers
ase, it's not immune to bugs. And its maturity has yet to slow its rapid pace of development. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-25 Thread Nick Desaulniers
on't take the plunge contributing to open source software or even the kernel. My advice to them is "don't sweat the small stuff." -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-25 Thread Nick Desaulniers
sking for help from one of your reviewers whom you trust. I don't doubt it's hard to find maintainers, but existing maintainers should go out of their way to entrust co-maintainers especially when they find their workload becomes too high. And reviewing/picking up trivial patches is probably a great way to get started. If we allow too much knowledge of any one subsystem to collect with one maintainer, what happens when that maintainer leaves the community (which, given a finite lifespan, is an inevitability)? -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2020-11-23 Thread Nick Desaulniers
hink we should just add `break`s for those. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks

2020-10-19 Thread Nick Desaulniers
apped in cc-option). I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1180 to follow up on. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: optionally allow interrupt enable flag writes

2020-01-13 Thread Nick Desaulniers
d_config_word(dev, offset, &val); >145 if (err || val == value) >146 return err; >147 >148 value &= PCI_COMMAND_GUEST; >149 value |= val & ~PCI_COMMAND_GUEST; >150 >151 return pci_write_config_word(dev, offset, value); >152 } >153 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org Intel Corporation > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clang-built-linux+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/202001112351.gy4c3aUU%25lkp%40intel.com. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/blkfront: Adjust indentation in xlvbd_alloc_gendisk

2019-12-09 Thread Nick Desaulniers
are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clang-built-linux+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://grou

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: xen: remove the use of VLAIS

2018-01-06 Thread Nick Desaulniers
Gross Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers --- Changes in v2: * Change mask to us DECLARE_BITMAP instead of pointer, as suggested. * Update commit message to remove mention of pointer. * Update sizeof calculation to work with array rather than pointer. arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 8 +++- 1 file chang

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen/time: fix section mismatch for xen_init_time_ops()

2018-01-06 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 01/02/2018 09:32 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 02/01/18 14:24, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 02/01/18 15:18, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> On 12/23/2017 09:50 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>>>> Th

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: xen: remove the use of VLAIS

2017-12-24 Thread Nick Desaulniers
om an earlier version of this patch). Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers --- arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c index 4d62c07..966976c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c +++ b/arch/x8

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen/time: fix section mismatch for xen_init_time_ops()

2017-12-23 Thread Nick Desaulniers
The header declares this function as __init but is defined in __ref section. Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers --- arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h index 75011b8..3b34745 100644 --- a/arch