On 30/04/19 2:14 AM, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 4/25/19 5:53 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:07:14PM +, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote:
>>> Hard-coding the special section group sizes is unreliable. Instead,
>>> determine them dynamically by finding the related struct
and fixed in
https://github.com/dynup/kpatch/pull/528 which says ...
"Hard-coding the special section group sizes is unreliable.
Instead, determine them dynamically by finding the related
struct definitions in the DWARF metadata."
Signed-off-by: Glenn Enright
Reviewed-by: Ross Lagerwa
and fixed in
https://github.com/dynup/kpatch/pull/528 which says ...
"Hard-coding the special section group sizes is unreliable.
Instead, determine them dynamically by finding the related
struct definitions in the DWARF metadata."
Signed-off-by: Glenn Enright
---
CC: Ross Lagerwall
/1/19 3:28 PM, Glenn Enright wrote:
I hit an issue generating a livepatch for a recent xsa. I saw the
following lines from the create-diff-object.log ...
/livepatch-build-tools/create-diff-object: ERROR: grant_table.o:
kpatch_regenerate_special_section: 1162: group size mismatch f
I hit an issue generating a livepatch for a recent xsa. I saw the
following lines from the create-diff-object.log ...
/livepatch-build-tools/create-diff-object: ERROR: grant_table.o:
kpatch_regenerate_special_section: 1162: group size mismatch for section
.altinstructions
This looks really s
Hi there
I'm trying to apply xsa263 patches, specifically for 4.10. However they
dont seem to on top of 4.10.1 release.
I see they do apply cleanly to current 4.10 staging branch. Are staging
trees for stable branches like 4.10 considered suitable/safe to rebase
to for packaging purposes? ie
