[PATCH] xen/passthrough: add missing error-report include

2025-07-17 Thread Adam Williamson
In cfcacba an `error_report` was added to this file, but the corresponding include of `qemu/error-report.h` was missed. This only becomes apparent when building against Xen 4.20+. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson --- hw/xen/xen_pt.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/xen

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
tever they do that Fedora doesn't here? > > It might be worth getting in touch with them. They look like a significant > Xen user, on Fedora. I have no idea, but those seem like reasonable questions. I'll see if I can track down a contact point for them. Thanks! -- Adam W

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 17:01 +0300, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:56:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > [...] > > So it seems like this would also be a good opportunity to revisit and > > nail down more specifically exactly what our cloud requirements are. >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 00:53 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Hey folks! I'm starting a new thread for this to trim the recipient > > list a bit and include devel@ and coreos@. > > > > The Stor

[Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
testcloud; testcloud isn't an environment you'd actually use to do anything practical in. 3. I believe this wording is generic enough to cover us if we, e.g., want to start blocking on CoreOS images. All we have to do is declare that some CoreOS image is 'release-blocking', and

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > > &

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > > > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, bu

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 09:57 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 7/8/19 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > > > > > providing > > > > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers > > > > &g

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
e proposal above work for you? I think it satisfies what you are > looking for. We would also have someone who monitors these test results > pro-actively. In theory, yeah, but given the history here I'm somewhat sceptical. I'd also say we still haven't really got a convinci

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-04-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is. > > > > > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested regularly &