Hello, Jan!
On 19.02.25 18:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2025 16:40, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.02.25 16:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2025 14:52, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.02.25 15:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2025 13:39, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 17.02.
Hello, Stefano!
On 20.02.25 03:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Yes, I do agree. But only if we talk about having an automated
code style check now (which is definitely the goal at some time).
Before that we could still use the tool to take all t
On Friday, February 21st, 2025 at 4:26 PM, dm...@proton.me
wrote:
>
>
> There are few places which check pv_shim console under CONFIG_PV_SHIM or
> CONFIG_X86 in xen console driver.
>
> Instead of #ifdef-ing, use new consoled_is_enabled() in switch_serial_input()
> and _serial_rx() (where pv_s
From: Denis Mukhin
There are few places which check pv_shim console under CONFIG_PV_SHIM or
CONFIG_X86 in xen console driver.
Instead of inconsistent #ifdef-ing, introduce and use consoled_is_enabled() in
switch_serial_input() and __serial_rx().
PV shim case is fixed in __serial_rx() - should b
