flight 186041 linux-linus real [real]
flight 186043 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186041/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186043/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run
Hi All,
Gentle ping since it has been a couple of months, any comments on this
updated patch? Thanks!
Kind regards,
Henry
On 3/21/2024 11:57 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of
cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of CPU0.
Hi Julien,
On 5/20/2024 8:41 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Julien,
Thanks for spending time on the review!
On 5/19/2024 6:17 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
On 16/05/2024 11:03, Henry Wang wrote:
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
index
Hi Julien,
On 5/20/2024 8:41 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Julien,
Thanks for spending time on the review!
On 5/19/2024 6:17 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
On 16/05/2024 11:03, Henry Wang wrote:
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
index
Hi Julien,
On 5/19/2024 7:08 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 17/05/2024 07:03, Henry Wang wrote:
@@ -444,14 +444,18 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d,
struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq,
{
/* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */
This comment needs t
Hi Julien,
Thanks for spending time on the review!
On 5/19/2024 6:17 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
On 16/05/2024 11:03, Henry Wang wrote:
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
index bbd955e9c2..61f9082553 100644
--- a/docs/misc/arm/dev
flight 186040 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186040/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 186036
Tests which are fai
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:05 AM Leigh Brown wrote:
>
> Add a new directory linux-bridge-vlan with example files showing
> how to configure systemd-networkd to support a bridge VLAN
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leigh Brown
The systemd network config looks like it matches the the systemd m
flight 186038 linux-linus real [real]
flight 186039 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186038/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186039/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run
Hi Ayan,
Sorry this patch fell through the cracks.
On 20/03/2024 18:54, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
This is similar to what is being done on x86.
OOI, how did you find this issue?
Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff
Hi,
On 17/05/2024 07:03, Henry Wang wrote:
On 5/16/2024 6:03 PM, Henry Wang wrote:
From: Vikram Garhwal
Currently, routing/removing physical interrupts are only allowed at
the domain creation/destroy time. For use cases such as dynamic device
tree overlay adding/removing, the routing/removi
Hi Henry,
On 16/05/2024 11:03, Henry Wang wrote:
There are some use cases in which the dom0less domUs need to have
the XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu set at the domain construction time. For
example, the dynamic dtbo feature allows the domain to be assigned
a device that is behind the IOMMU at runtime. Fo
Hi Henry,
On 16/05/2024 11:03, Henry Wang wrote:
If CONFIG_DEBUG=y, below assertion will be triggered:
(XEN) Assertion 'rw_is_locked(&dt_host_lock)' failed at
drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c:146
(XEN) [ Xen-4.19-unstable arm64 debug=y Not tainted ]
[...]
(XEN) Xen call trace:
(XEN)
flight 186037 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186037/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 8 xen-boot fail pass in 186033
Tests which did not succeed, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
