Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: replace arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access()

Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kernel: add platform_has() infrastructure

Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH] swiotlb-xen: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING on arm

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 03:49:53PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On one hand, Linux doesn't boot on a platform without this fix. On the > other hand, I totally see that this patch could introduce regressions on > x86 so I think it is fair that we are careful with it. > > >From my point of vie

[ovmf test] 170260: regressions - FAIL

flight 170260 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170260/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170259: regressions - FAIL

flight 170259 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170259/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170258: regressions - FAIL

flight 170258 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170258/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170255: regressions - FAIL

flight 170255 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170255/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170254: regressions - FAIL

flight 170254 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170254/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170253: regressions - FAIL

flight 170253 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170253/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170251: regressions - FAIL

flight 170251 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170251/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[linux-linus test] 170245: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 170245 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170245/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 170221 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saver

[ovmf test] 170250: regressions - FAIL

flight 170250 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170250/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170249: regressions - FAIL

flight 170249 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170249/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170248: regressions - FAIL

flight 170248 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170248/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170247: regressions - FAIL

flight 170247 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170247/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170246: regressions - FAIL

flight 170246 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170246/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Virtio toolstack support for I2C and GPIO on Arm

On 05.05.22 10:33, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hello Viresh Hello, This patchset adds toolstack support for I2C and GPIO virtio devices. This is inspired from the work done by Oleksandr for the Disk device [1]. Great work! The first two patches can be applied right away, but the last two need

[ovmf test] 170244: regressions - FAIL

flight 170244 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170244/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170243: regressions - FAIL

flight 170243 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170243/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

Re: [PATCH 4/4] libxl: Allocate MMIO params for GPIO device and update DT

On 05.05.22 10:33, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hello Viresh This patch allocates Virtio MMIO params (IRQ and memory region) and pass them to the backend, also update Guest device-tree. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c | 60 1 file

[ovmf test] 170242: regressions - FAIL

flight 170242 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170242/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

Re: [PATCH 3/4] libxl: Allocate MMIO params for I2c device and update DT

On 05.05.22 10:33, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hello Viresh This patch allocates Virtio MMIO params (IRQ and memory region) and pass them to the backend, also update Guest device-tree. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c | 57 ++-- 1 file

[ovmf test] 170241: regressions - FAIL

flight 170241 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170241/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[xen-unstable test] 170232: tolerable FAIL

flight 170232 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170232/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 8 xen-boot fail in 170220 pass in 170232 test-amd64-i386-examine-uefi 6

[ovmf test] 170240: regressions - FAIL

flight 170240 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170240/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170239: regressions - FAIL

flight 170239 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170239/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170238: regressions - FAIL

flight 170238 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170238/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[ovmf test] 170237: regressions - FAIL

flight 170237 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170237/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

[PATCH 3/3] include/hw/ide: Unexport pci_piix3_xen_ide_unplug()

This function was declared in a generic and public header, implemented in a device-specific source file but only used in xen_platform. Given its 'aux' parameter, this function is more xen-specific than piix-specific. Also, the hardcoded magic constants seem to be generic and related to PCIIDEState

[qemu-mainline test] 170224: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 170224 qemu-mainline real [real] flight 170235 qemu-mainline real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170224/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170235/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-am

[libvirt test] 170231: regressions - FAIL

flight 170231 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170231/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-i386-libvirt

[ovmf test] 170236: regressions - FAIL

flight 170236 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170236/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64

Re: [PATCH] build/xen: fix symbol generation with LLVM LD

On 06.05.2022 17:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 05.05.2022 16:21, Roger Pau Monne wrote: --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h

[ovmf test] 170234: regressions - FAIL

flight 170234 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170234/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64