Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] xen: Populate xen.lds.h and make use of its macros

Hi Julien, On 08.04.2022 19:58, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On 05/04/2022 10:16, Michal Orzel wrote: >>   #if defined(BUILD_ID) >> @@ -109,12 +104,7 @@ SECTIONS >> *(.data.schedulers) >> __end_schedulers_array = .; >>   -#ifdef CONFIG_HYPFS >> -   . = ALIGN(8); > >

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] xen/arm: Add i.MX lpuart driver

Hi Peng, On 08.04.2022 16:09, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > The i.MX LPUART Documentation: > https://www.nxp.com/webapp/Download?colCode=IMX8QMIEC > Chatper 13.6 Low Power Universal Asynchronous Receiver/ > Transmitter (LPUART) > > Tested-by: Henry Wang > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan

Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] xen/arm: Add i.MX lpuart early printk support

Hi Peng, On 08.04.2022 16:09, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > xen/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 14 +++ > xen/arch/arm/arm64/debug-imx-lpuart.inc | 52 + > 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 xen

Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] xen/cpupool: Create different cpupools at boot time

On 08.04.2022 22:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 08.04.2022 13:37, Luca Fancellu wrote: >>> >>> On 8 Apr 2022, at 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.04.2022 10:45, Luca Fancellu wrote: > --- > docs/misc/arm/device-tree/cpupools.txt |

Re: [PATCH RFC] evtchn: add early-out to evtchn_move_pirqs()

On 08.04.2022 19:17, Julien Grall wrote: > On 08/04/2022 13:25, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 08.04.2022 13:02, Julien Grall wrote: >>> On 08/04/2022 08:16, Jan Beulich wrote: See the code comment. The higher the rate of vCPU-s migrating across pCPU-s, the less useful this attempted optimizati

[ovmf test] 169295: regressions - FAIL

flight 169295 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169295/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[linux-linus test] 169286: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 169286 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169286/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 169276 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saver

[ovmf test] 169293: regressions - FAIL

flight 169293 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169293/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169291: regressions - FAIL

flight 169291 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169291/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169290: regressions - FAIL

flight 169290 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169290/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

RE: [PATCH v3] SUPPORT.md: add Dom0less as Supported

Hi Julien and Stefano, > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall > > > > For the patch I don't have any comments, but I think here we've got > > a typo: s/messahe/message. I think it is ok to fix while committing this > > patch so this is just a kind reminder :)) > > Anything after --- w

[ovmf test] 169289: regressions - FAIL

flight 169289 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169289/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169288: regressions - FAIL

flight 169288 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169288/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169287: regressions - FAIL

flight 169287 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169287/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169285: regressions - FAIL

flight 169285 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169285/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[linux-linus test] 169276: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 169276 linux-linus real [real] flight 169284 linux-linus real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169276/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169284/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-

[ovmf test] 169283: regressions - FAIL

flight 169283 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169283/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169282: regressions - FAIL

flight 169282 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169282/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169281: regressions - FAIL

flight 169281 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169281/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169280: regressions - FAIL

flight 169280 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169280/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169279: regressions - FAIL

flight 169279 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169279/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[xen-unstable test] 169273: tolerable FAIL

flight 169273 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169273/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu 20 guest-localmigrate/x10fail pass in 169264 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debian

[ovmf test] 169278: regressions - FAIL

flight 169278 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169278/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169277: regressions - FAIL

flight 169277 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169277/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169275: regressions - FAIL

flight 169275 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169275/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[linux-linus test] 169269: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 169269 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169269/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 15 saverestore-support-check fail blocked in 169262 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-a

Re: [PATCH v3 06/19] xen/arm: mm: Avoid flushing the TLBs when mapping are inserted

Hi Stefano, On 05/04/2022 21:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2022, Julien Grall wrote: Maybe it would be clearer if I write: !((flags & _PAGE_PRESENT) && !mfn_eq(mfn, INVALID_MFN)) It is not much a matter of clarity -- I just wanted to check with you the reasons for the if cond

Re: [PATCH v3 04/19] xen/arm: mm: Allow other mapping size in xen_pt_update_entry()

Hi Stefano, On 05/04/2022 21:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2022, Julien Grall wrote: On 02/04/2022 00:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote: +/* Return the level where mapping should be done */ +static int xen_pt_mapping_level(unsigned long vfn, mfn_t mfn, unsigned long nr, +

[libvirt test] 169270: regressions - FAIL

flight 169270 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169270/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-arm64-libvirt

[ovmf test] 169274: regressions - FAIL

flight 169274 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169274/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[ovmf test] 169272: regressions - FAIL

flight 169272 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169272/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254 build-amd64-xsm

[xen-unstable test] 169264: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 169264 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169264/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 169251 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 save