flight 163505 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163505/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
flight 163482 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163482/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 163503 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163503/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 163474
Tests which
flight 163478 xen-unstable real [real]
flight 163502 xen-unstable real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163478/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163502/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be r
flight 163484 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163484/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 04:39:58PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08.07.21 16:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Xen backends of para-virtualized devices can live in dom0 kernel, dom0
> > > user land, or in a driver domain. Th
flight 163489 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163489/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 163474
Tests which
On 7/1/21 8:10 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
This allows to `make arch/riscv/riscv64/head.o`.
Example of rune on a fresh copy of the repository:
make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv64 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
KBUILD_DEFCONFIG=tiny64_defconfig arch/riscv/riscv64/head.o
Signed-off-by: Anthony
branch xen-unstable-smoke
xenbranch xen-unstable-smoke
job build-amd64
testid xen-build
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree
flight 163480 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163480/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 163474
Tests which
flight 163464 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163464/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 13 guest-startfail REGR. vs. 163321
test-amd64-amd64-
flight 163475 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163475/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
flight 163461 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163461/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-
Julien Grall writes ("Re: gitlab merge request -> list patchbomb workflows"):
> I have recently started to use b4 [1] to fetch patches and collect tags
> from the mailing list. I am wondering if the tools could be extended to
> also allow a quick look through of the review "state" of each patch?
Hi Ian,
On 09/07/2021 16:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
At Xen Summit we had another discussion about patch submission and
review workflows.
We agreed that it would be a nice idea to conduct another experiment
with gitlab MRs. The previous experiment yielded negative results,
but we think we might be
At Xen Summit we had another discussion about patch submission and
review workflows.
We agreed that it would be a nice idea to conduct another experiment
with gitlab MRs. The previous experiment yielded negative results,
but we think we might be able to do better.
The shape of the experiment was
On 07/05/2021 16:28, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
Hi Michal,
On 09/07/2021 13:40, Michal Orzel wrote:
AArch64 system registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 ones
are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus
we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG.
The last place in code making use of REA
flight 163474 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163474/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
flight 163458 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163458/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 163436
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20
Hi Michal,
> On 9 Jul 2021, at 13:40, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
> AArch64 system registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 ones
> are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus
> we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
> in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG.
>
> The last place in co
Hi,
On 09/07/2021 15:58, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Costin,
On 08/06/2021 13:35, Costin Lupu wrote:
For replication I used gcc 10.3 on an Alpine system. In order to
replicate the
redefinition error for PAGE_SIZE one should install the 'fortify-headers'
package which will change the chain of inclu
Hi Costin,
On 08/06/2021 13:35, Costin Lupu wrote:
For replication I used gcc 10.3 on an Alpine system. In order to replicate the
redefinition error for PAGE_SIZE one should install the 'fortify-headers'
package which will change the chain of included headers by indirectly including
/usr/include
flight 163466 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163466/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
qemu-xen-traditional may make use of pciutils-devel, for PCI passthrough.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
---
automation/build/suse/opensuse-leap.dockerfile | 1 +
automation/build/suse/opensuse-tumbleweed.dockerfile | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/automation/build/suse/op
qemu-xen-traditional may make use of SDL, qemu-xen may make use of SDL2.
Use pkgconfig() as resolvable instead of a rpm name, the latter may change.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
---
automation/build/suse/opensuse-leap.dockerfile | 3 ++-
automation/build/suse/opensuse-tumbleweed.dockerfile |
qemu uses meson as for configuration, and requires ninja for building.
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
---
automation/build/suse/opensuse-tumbleweed.dockerfile | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/automation/build/suse/opensuse-tumbleweed.dockerfile
b/automation/build/suse/opensuse-
On 09.07.21 11:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Today blkfront will trust the backend to send only sane response data.
In order to avoid privilege escalations or crashes in case of malicious
backends verify the data to be within expected l
On 09.07.21 10:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:44PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
In order to avoid a malicious backend being able to influence the local
copy of a request build the request locally first and then copy it to
the ring page instead of doing it the other way r
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd
testid redhat-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.
flight 163460 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163460/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
AArch64 system registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 ones
are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus
we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG.
The last place in code making use of READ/WRITE_SYSREG32
on arm64 is in TVM_REG macro defining
On 08.07.21 19:40, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 08/06/2021 06:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstored is absolutely mandatory for a Xen host and it can't be
restarted, so being killed by OOM-killer in case of memory shortage is
to be avoided.
Set /proc/$pid/oom_score_adj (if available) to -50
On 09/07/2021 13:23, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Am Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:02:54 +0100
> schrieb Andrew Cooper :
>
>> Do we need the ls here? That sounds a little like debugging.
> Maybe not, it may show a long list of unrelated stuff.
> It is just to verify a fresh container exists, as you said, just for
>
Am Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:02:54 +0100
schrieb Andrew Cooper :
> Do we need the ls here? That sounds a little like debugging.
Maybe not, it may show a long list of unrelated stuff.
It is just to verify a fresh container exists, as you said, just for debugging.
Olaf
pgpahhJuyjXXo.pgp
Description: D
On 09/07/2021 12:37, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Meanwhile I would like to promote our xenstat-exporter, which we use
> for monitoring our vps instances.
>
> https://github.com/euronetzrt/xenstat-exporter
>
> We've spotted the bug during browsing the metrics.
He
On 08/07/2021 15:56, Olaf Hering wrote:
> The Tumbleweed container should be updated often.
> Describe the neccessary steps how to refresh and test it before
> pushing the new image to gitlab.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
> ---
> automation/build/README.md | 13 +
> 1 file changed,
On 08/07/2021 15:56, Olaf Hering wrote:
> containerize bash -c './configure && make' fails due to shell expansion.
>
> Collect all arguments for the script and pass them verbatim to the
> docker run command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:12:08 +0100
Wei Chen wrote:
Hi Wei,
> I have some thoughts of using kvmtool Virtio implementation
> for Xen. I copied my markdown file to this email. If you have
> time, could you please help me review it?
>
> Any feedback is welcome!
>
> # Some thoughts on using kvmtool
Dear Andrew,
Many thanks.
Meanwhile I would like to promote our xenstat-exporter, which we use for
monitoring our vps instances.
https://github.com/euronetzrt/xenstat-exporter
We've spotted the bug during browsing the metrics.
Regards,
Richard
2021-07-09 13:30 időpontban Andrew Cooper ezt
On 16/06/2021 14:14, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Use a snapshot which includes commit
> f3f568e382a5f19824b3bfc6081cde39eee661e8 ("[crypto] Add
> memory output constraints for big-integer inline assembly"),
> which fixes build with gcc11.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper and commi
On 09/07/2021 10:32, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
> Then please add signed-by headers. :)
Ok. I have fixed up and committed the patch.
https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=89d57f291e37b4769ab26db919eba46548f2e13e
This will want queueing for backporting
~Andrew
Hi Juergen,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20210708]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
ht
flight 163468 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163468/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Today blkfront will trust the backend to send only sane response data.
> In order to avoid privilege escalations or crashes in case of malicious
> backends verify the data to be within expected limits. Especially make
> sure that the
Hi Olaf,
On 01/07/2021 10:56, Olaf Hering wrote:
Move all save/restore related code from libxenguest.so into a separate
library libxensaverestore.so. The only consumer is libxl-save-helper.
There is no need to have the moved code mapped all the time in binaries
where libxenguest.so is used.
Acc
Am Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:31:53 +0100
schrieb Julien Grall :
> Were they resolved?
I think so, yes.
Olaf
pgpzyBiz0fdoc.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Then please add signed-by headers. :)
Thanks
2021. július 9. 10:59:54 CEST, Andrew Cooper írta:
>On 09/07/2021 09:09, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
>
>Thankyou for the patch. That is quite an embarrassing bug.
>
>However, for copyright reasons, we require all submissions to contain a
>Signed-off
Hi Olaf,
On 09/07/2021 10:20, Olaf Hering wrote:
Am Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:56:02 +0200
schrieb Olaf Hering :
Move all save/restore related code
This is now 6 months old.
What is blocking approval?
There is already an ack from Wei which should be sufficient for the
tools part.
But looking
Am Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:56:02 +0200
schrieb Olaf Hering :
> Move all save/restore related code
This is now 6 months old.
What is blocking approval?
Olaf
pgpeunYVbmhgb.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Hi Elliott,
On 08/07/2021 23:05, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 05:06:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 08/07/2021 02:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/07/2021 01:32, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Hopefully I'm not about to show the limits of my knowledge...
Quite a few values passe
On 09/07/2021 09:59, Costin Lupu wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Costin,
On 7/8/21 8:33 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Costin,
On 08/06/2021 13:35, Costin Lupu wrote:
If PAGE_SIZE is already defined in the system (e.g. in
/usr/include/limits.h
header) then gcc will trigger a redefinition error becaus
On 09/07/2021 09:09, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
Thankyou for the patch. That is quite an embarrassing bug.
However, for copyright reasons, we require all submissions to contain a
Signed-off-by line, as per the Developer's Certificate of Origin,
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Pr
Hi Julien,
On 7/8/21 8:33 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Costin,
>
> On 08/06/2021 13:35, Costin Lupu wrote:
>> If PAGE_SIZE is already defined in the system (e.g. in
>> /usr/include/limits.h
>> header) then gcc will trigger a redefinition error because of -Werror.
>> This
>> patch replaces usage o
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:44PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In order to avoid a malicious backend being able to influence the local
> copy of a request build the request locally first and then copy it to
> the ring page instead of doing it the other way round as today.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juer
flight 163450 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163450/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 163198
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:43:43PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In order to avoid problems in case the backend is modifying a response
> on the ring page while the frontend has already seen it, just read the
> response into a local buffer in one go and then operate on that buffer
> only.
>
> Sign
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:02:32PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> QEMU requires ninja and bash to build now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
Thanks!
From d09d27e40cfbdd2dbf5aefaa40a4f46ccb268056 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
From: Richard Kojedzinszky
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:06:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] xenstat_linux.c: fix populating vbd.rd_sect
---
tools/libs/stat/xenstat_linux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(
59 matches
Mail list logo
