flight 162365 xen-4.14-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162365/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail like 161771
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16
flight 162381 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
flight 162384 xen-unstable-smoke real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162381/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162384/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which co
flight 162366 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162366/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail like 161772
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-a
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, Penny Zheng wrote:
> > > > In system device tree we would use a property called "memory" to
> > > > specify one or more ranges, e.g.:
> > > >
> > > > domU1 {
> > > > memory = <0x0 0x50 0x0 0x7fb0>;
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately for xen,domains we have already
Hi all,
Lenovo released a new UEFI update for the Lenovo X13/T14s, changelog is here:
https://download.lenovo.com/pccbbs/mobiles/r1cuj63wd.txt
It lists "Fixed an issue that Fixed TSC synchronization failed under linux."
as a fix, I can confirm after removing the tsc=unstable CMDLINE everything
flight 162374 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
flight 162377 xen-unstable-smoke real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162374/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162377/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which co
flight 162362 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162362/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs.
152631
test-amd64-am
flight 162370 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
flight 162372 xen-unstable-smoke real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162370/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162372/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which co
Hi Juergen,
On 04/06/2021 07:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
This is a resend of V2 with the Acks folded in.
Thank you for resending with the Acks. It is now pushed!
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
Hi Claire,
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 08:58:30PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> This series implements mitigations for lack of DMA access control on
> systems without an IOMMU, which could result in the DMA accessing the
> system memory at unexpected times and/or unexpected addresses, possibly
> leadin
flight 162368 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162368/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 3 hosts-allocate starved n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 3 hosts
flight 162361 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162361/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 162273
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debi
On 06/04/21 16:02, Anthony PERARD via groups.io wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:36:49AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Anthony, Julien,
>>
>> (or anyone else subscribed to xen-devel -- CC'd now),
>>
>> On 05/26/21 22:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.c
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:53:15AM +0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi!
You wouldn't have a nice git repo to pull so one can test it easily?
Thank you!
Cc-ing Boris/Juergen - pls see below xen.
>
> this series is the scond part of cleaning up lifetimes and allocation of
> the gendisk
flight 162358 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162358/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 162359 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162359/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf c410ad4da4b7785170d3d42a3ba190c2caac6feb
baseline version:
ovmf 75e9154f818a58ffc3a28
On 06/04/21 16:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:36:49AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Anthony, Julien,
>>
>> (or anyone else subscribed to xen-devel -- CC'd now),
>>
>> On 05/26/21 22:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2122
>>>
From: Guenter Roeck
All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 -
arch/
From: Guenter Roeck
All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
From: Guenter Roeck
By making use of the kernel restart handler, board specific restart
handlers can be prioritized amongst available mechanisms for a particular
board or system.
Select the default priority of 128 to indicate that the restart callback
in the machine description is the default re
From: Guenter Roeck
Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly. This enables support for replacing the PSCI restart handler
with a different handler if necessary for a specific board.
Select a priority of 129 to indicate a higher than default priority, but
ke
From: Guenter Roeck
Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly.
Select a high priority of 192 to ensure that default restart handlers
are replaced if Xen is running.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Signed-
This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
then forgotten about. It's still considered useful.
Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
"Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
earlier. There's some background on
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:36:49AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Anthony, Julien,
>
> (or anyone else subscribed to xen-devel -- CC'd now),
>
> On 05/26/21 22:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2122
> > Repo: https://pagure.io/lersek/edk2.git
>
On 03.06.2021 11:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 27/05/2021 14:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.05.2021 15:06, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 27/05/2021 13:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -1046,12 +1051,14 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_page
if ( first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX ||
> On May 6, 2021, at 1:47 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> The support status of 32-bit guests doesn't seem particularly useful.
>
> With it changed to fully unsupported outside of PV-shim, adjust the PV32
> Kconfig default accordingly.
>
> Reported-by: Jann Horn
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
flight 162357 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162357/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl broken
Tests which are fail
flight 162360 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162360/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
Juergen Gross schreef op 2021-06-04 09:10:
On 04.06.21 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.06.2021 18:01, AL13N wrote:
Jan Beulich schreef op 2021-06-01 16:53:
On 01.06.2021 16:44, AL13N wrote:
This mailing list is the correct place for the toolstack too?
right?
Yes.
So, what's the plan to fi
flight 162356 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162356/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs.
152631
test-amd64-am
On 04.06.21 08:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.06.2021 18:01, AL13N wrote:
Jan Beulich schreef op 2021-06-01 16:53:
On 01.06.2021 16:44, AL13N wrote:
This mailing list is the correct place for the toolstack too? right?
Yes.
So, what's the plan to fix this? is the plan to fix the toolstack? or
31 matches
Mail list logo
