Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 5/7] libxl: allow creation of domains with a specified or random domid

2020-02-02 Thread Durrant, Paul
> -Original Message- > From: jandr...@gmail.com > Sent: 31 January 2020 17:23 > To: Durrant, Paul > Cc: xen-devel ; Ian Jackson > ; Wei Liu ; Anthony PERARD > ; Andrew Cooper ; > George Dunlap ; Jan Beulich > ; Julien Grall ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > ; Stefano Stabellini > Subject: Re: [P

Re: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0

2020-02-02 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote: > Hello again, > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV: > > #0  0x7f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > #1  0x55723b9c

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 146689: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146689 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146689/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 146182 build-i386-libvirt

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvmx: fix handling of interrupts

2020-02-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Roger Pau Monné > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 8:32 PM > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:34:13AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > From: Roger Pau Monné > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 6:19 PM > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 04:15:04AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > > > From: Ro

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146688: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146688 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146688/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] xen: split parameter related definitions in own header file

2020-02-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Juergen Gross > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 4:43 PM > > Move the parameter related definitions from init.h into a new header > file param.h. This will avoid include hell when new dependencies are > added to parameter definitions. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross Reviewed-by: Kevin

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/EPT: drop redundant ept_p2m_type_to_flags() parameters

2020-02-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 10:41 PM > > All callers set the respective fields in the entry being updated before > the call. > > Take the opportunity and also constify the first parameter as well as > make a few style adjustments. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Rev

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] EPT: do away with hidden GUEST_TABLE_MAP_FAILED == 0 assumptions

2020-02-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020 12:36 AM > > The code is quite a bit easier to read and to reason about this way, > I think. > > In ept_set_entry() additionally change the function's return value in > the MAP_FAILED case to -ENOMEM; -ENOENT would be applicable only when >

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 146676: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146676 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146676/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 146563

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] MdePkg: Allow PcdFSBClock to by Dynamic

2020-02-02 Thread Gao, Liming
Anthony: This change is OK to me. But if this PCD is configured as Dynamic, its value will be got from PCD service. This operation will take some time and cause the inaccurate time delay. Have you measured its impact? Thanks Liming > -Original Message- > From: Laszlo Ersek > Sent: Thu

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146680: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146680 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146680/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 146678: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146678 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146678/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 145767 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[Xen-devel] [linux-5.4 test] 146675: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146675 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146675/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 146121 test-amd64-i386-xl

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146677: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146677 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146677/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 146671: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146671 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146671/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 145767 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146673: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146673 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 146668: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146668 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146668/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 146563

[Xen-devel] [linux-5.4 test] 146667: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146667 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146667/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 146121 test-amd64-i386-xl

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146669: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146669 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146669/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 145796: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-02-02 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 12:57 +, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Dario, > Hi, > Apologies for the late answer. > No problem, I also did not had any more time to look into this yet. > On 22/01/2020 03:40, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 18:24 +, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > You

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 145796: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-02-02 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Dario, Apologies for the late answer. On 22/01/2020 03:40, Dario Faggioli wrote: On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 18:24 +, Julien Grall wrote: Hi all, Hi Julien, I was looking at this, and I have a couple of questions... On 08/01/2020 23:14, Julien Grall wrote: On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 21:40, o

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 146662: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146662 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146662/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 145767 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 146658: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146658 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146658/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144861 build-arm64-xsm

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 146651: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146651 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146651/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 146563

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 146660: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146660 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146660/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 146182 build-i386-libvirt

[Xen-devel] [linux-5.4 test] 146655: regressions - FAIL

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 146655 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/146655/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 146121 test-amd64-i3

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 146666: all pass - PUSHED

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
flight 14 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/14/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 41d8869003e96d8b7250ad1d0246371d6929aca6 baseline version: xen f910

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: migrate migration stream definitions into Xen public headers

2020-02-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On 1 February 2020 11:45:42 GMT, "Durrant, Paul" wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: David Woodhouse >> Sent: 01 February 2020 00:40 >> To: xen-devel >> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ; >Andrew >> Cooper ; George Dunlap >> ; Jan Beulich ; >Julien >> Grall ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >; >> Ste

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm

2020-02-02 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm testid debian-hvm-install Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditiona