flight 134029 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134029/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm broken
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1
flight 134027 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134027/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 broken
test-arm64-arm64-xl
flight 134016 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134016/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm broken
test-arm64-arm64-libvi
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:05:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >
> > > Porting a patch
> > > forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complain
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:05:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
> > Porting a patch
> > forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> > of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
>
> And th
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 83781 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/83781/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64
flight 134015 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134015/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 133924
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 08:00:52AM -0400, Ryan Thibodeaux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:10:16PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 3/22/19 2:29 PM, thibo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Ryan Thibodeaux
> > >
> > > Add a new command-line option "xen_timer_slop=" that sets the
> > > minimum
On 3/23/2019 11:50 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 05:46:26PM -0700, John L. Poole wrote:
On 3/22/2019 7:40 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 22/03/2019 09:53, John L. Poole wrote:
3)Xen Source - here is the log of an attempt adding
"cpuinfor maxcpus=1 watchdog"
as an option in m
flight 134010 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134010/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs.
129313
build-i386-p
Dear Lars,
as briefly discussed I will be there around 11:00, I hope I will "recover"
what lost in due first 2 hours and provide still a good contribution.
See you tomorrow.
Best Regards,
Francesco
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:53 PM +0100, "Lars Kurth"
wrote:
Hi all
flight 134007 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134007/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 133957
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 save
flight 134045 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134045/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
coverity-amd647 coverity-upload fail REGR. vs. 133615
version t
13 matches
Mail list logo
