[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 123212: regressions - FAIL

flight 123212 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123212/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 6 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 123189 Tests which did not suc

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 74748: all pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 74748 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74748/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 7dc7c7435e9030ad07ad7bc7d136a3997bd0b182 baseline v

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.14 test] 123201: regressions - FAIL

flight 123201 linux-4.14 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123201/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 6 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 123147 test-arm64-arm64-lib

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/9] x86/vmx: Fix handing of MSR_DEBUGCTL on VMExit

> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:21 PM > > Currently, whenever the guest writes a nonzero value to MSR_DEBUGCTL, > Xen > updates a host MSR load list entry with the current hardware value of > MSR_DEBUGCTL. This is wrong. > > On VMExit, har

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] x86/vmx: Support remote access to the MSR lists

> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:21 PM > > At the moment, all modifications of the MSR lists are in current context. > However, future changes may need to put MSR_EFER into the lists from > domctl > hypercall context. > > Plumb a struct vcpu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/9] x86/vmx: Factor locate_msr_entry() out of vmx_find_msr() and vmx_add_msr()

> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:21 PM > > Instead of having multiple algorithms searching the MSR lists, implement a > single one. It has the semantics required by vmx_add_msr(), to identify the > position in which an MSR should live, if it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/9] x86/vmx: Internal cleanup for MSR load/save infrastructure

> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:21 PM > > * Use an arch_vmx_struct local variable to reduce later code volume. > * Use start/total instead of msr_area/msr_count. This is in preparation for >more finegrained handling with later changes

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] x86/vmx: API improvements for MSR load/save infrastructure

> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:21 PM > > Collect together related infrastructure in vmcs.h, rather than having it > spread out. Turn vmx_{read,write}_guest_msr() into static inlines, as they > are simple enough. > > Replace 'int type' wit

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 123204: all pass - PUSHED

flight 123204 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123204/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 03ac238b1fe40cfbb1424bf72e2ac8276345e03c baseline version: ovmf 7dc7c7435e9030ad07ad7

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 123197: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 123197 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123197/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 123135 pass in 123197

[Xen-devel] [xtf test] 123198: all pass - PUSHED

flight 123198 xtf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123198/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xtf 8d99d59dd4c330cd849ee0013c79c3fb5b1028f2 baseline version: xtf bc35269fccd1926302b83c

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 123196: regressions - FAIL

flight 123196 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123196/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 6 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 123079 test-arm64-arm64-xl-

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd testid xen-boot Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 123190: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 123190 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123190/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-xsm broken build-armhf-xsm 5 host-build-

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 123188: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 123188 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123188/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 118324 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 123186: regressions - FAIL

flight 123186 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123186/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 122357 test-amd64-i386-f

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 123189: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 123189 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/123189/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 123120 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saveresto