Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2/2]xen/sched_credit2.c : Runqueue per core

2015-03-11 Thread Uma Sharma
included. :'( On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Uma Sharma wrote: > Thank you :-) > > I will work on the things you mentioned and resend the patch. > It's great to work on patches. I was trying to figure out how to > change the code so it looks neat and now I have the answe

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] credit2 runqueue_per_core code

2015-03-12 Thread Uma Sharma
24.423 make -j 8 22.109 So according to these analysis core scheduler is working better than socket. And in the case of guest with 4 cores runqueue_per_core credit2 scheduler is working slightly better than credit scheduler. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma x86: identifying the boot cpu

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] x86: identifying the boot cpu

2015-03-12 Thread Uma Sharma
Provide helpers to access the socket and core IDs, resulting from identification phase. Initialize socket and core ID to -1 i.e invalid instead of 0. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- xen/arch/x86/setup.c| 7 +-- xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 3 ++- xen/include/asm-x86

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] sched_credit2.c : runqueue_per_core code

2015-03-12 Thread Uma Sharma
This patch do the following things: -Insertion of runqueue_per_core code -Boot paarmeter creation to select runqueue Signed-off-by : Uma Sharma --- xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 39 --- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] docs : documentation for the code

2015-03-12 Thread Uma Sharma
This patch inserts boot paramter documentation in xen-command-line.markdown. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown index 63871cb

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] credit2 runqueue_per_core code

2015-03-13 Thread Uma Sharma
24.423 make -j 8 22.109 So according to these analysis core scheduler is working better than socket. And in the case of guest with 4 cores runqueue_per_core credit2 scheduler is working slightly better than credit scheduler. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma Uma Sharma (2): [Xen-devel] x86

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86: identifying the boot cpu

2015-03-13 Thread Uma Sharma
in case of credit2 socket scheduler and on core 0 in case of credit2 core scheduler. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- xen/arch/x86/setup.c| 7 +-- xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 3 ++- xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code

2015-03-13 Thread Uma Sharma
This patch do the following things: -Insertion of runqueue_per_core code -Boot paarmeter creation to select runqueue -Update of xen-command-line.markdown Signed-off-by : Uma Sharma --- docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 7 +++ xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 31

[Xen-devel] [Patch 1/2]xen boot_cpu_data initialize

2015-03-09 Thread Uma Sharma
This patch inserts some boot data initilization in xen/arch and function definition in xen/include. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c index d316212..4f3ce15 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c @@ -1259,6 +1259,11

[Xen-devel] [Patch 2/2]xen/sched_credit2.c : Runqueue per core

2015-03-09 Thread Uma Sharma
This patch inserts runqueue_per_core code. And also makes generic selection for runqueue by using boot paarmeter. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c index ad0a5d4..2075e70 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c +++ b/xen/common

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 1/2]xen boot_cpu_data initialize

2015-03-09 Thread Uma Sharma
Thank you :-) Sure I have no problem, you can add second patch of this series. I will work on the comments and will again resend the patch. Thank you. Regards, Uma Sharma On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > Hi Uma, > > First of all, nice to see the patch here on

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2/2]xen/sched_credit2.c : Runqueue per core

2015-03-09 Thread Uma Sharma
Thank you :-) I will work on the things you mentioned and resend the patch. It's great to work on patches. I was trying to figure out how to change the code so it looks neat and now I have the answer. Thank you. :-) I will summarize the performance in cover patch. Regards, Uma Sharma O

Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: [OPW PATCH 1/4] tools/xl: Calling _init and _dispose function for libxl types

2015-01-13 Thread Uma Sharma
after the freeze. > >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Uma Sharma wrote: >> > Should I resend the patches then? >> >> On the xen-devel list, always reply at the bottom, like this. :-) >> >> I think normally it wouldn't matter, but since the point of th

[Xen-devel] [Patch] static and __initdata symbols in credit2

2015-01-14 Thread Uma Sharma
Changing param varibales in sched_credit2.c as static and marking them as __initdata where required. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c index 1ca521b..581493d 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c

[Xen-devel] [Patch] static symbols in credit2

2015-01-14 Thread Uma Sharma
Changing param varibales in sched_credit2.c as static where required. Signed-off-by: Uma Sharma --- diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c index 1ca521b..9dd8e84 100644 --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ #define

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] static symbols in credit2

2015-01-22 Thread Uma Sharma
Hi, Dariof, I am not able to understand the last statement. On 21 Jan 2015 20:15, "George Dunlap" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Uma Sharma > wrote: > > Changing param varibales in sched_credit2.c as static where required. > > > > Signed-off-by: U

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] static symbols in credit2

2015-01-22 Thread Uma Sharma
data ? On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Uma Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > Dariof, I am not able to understand the last statement. > > On 21 Jan 2015 20:15, "George Dunlap" wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Uma Sharma >> wrote: >> &