On 03/25/2016 12:11 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:10:59PM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> It seems the logic is meant to detect sector unaligned buffers for block
>> writes. The NOTing of the logic instead masks off any unaligned bits and
>> also would
On 03/29/2016 07:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Ross Philipson
> wrote:
>> On 03/25/2016 12:11 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:10:59PM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
>>>> It seems the logic is meant to detect s
On 04/06/2016 10:39 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ross Philipson writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: Invalid logic detecting
> unaligned buffers in vhd_write_block"):
>> It seems the logic is meant to detect sector unaligned buffers for block
>> writes. The NOTing of the
On 04/06/2016 10:39 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ross Philipson writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2: Invalid logic detecting
> unaligned buffers in vhd_write_block"):
>> It seems the logic is meant to detect sector unaligned buffers for block
>> writes. The NOTing of the
On 03/29/2016 07:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Ross Philipson
> wrote:
>> On 03/25/2016 12:11 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:10:59PM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
>>>> It seems the logic is meant to detect s
ecause we cannot trust EFI due to lack of its measurement.
>> I am not sure it is true or not. I though that somebody played with tboot
>> and Xen and has some knowledge in that area. Anyway, I will investigate
>> this further. However, any knowledge sharing is greatly appreciated.
>
I did test and review this submission back when I worked on the OpenXT
project with Christopher so I can add a reviewed by.
Reviewed-by: Ross Philipson
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.08.17 at 23:55, wrote:
> > On 08/18/2017 05:02 PM
a way forward to providing this functionality within Xen
> > > software or Linux> Christopher
> > > --
> > >
> > > openxt.org
> > >
> >
>
> ___
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
--
Ross Philipson
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
at an xHCI host controller? If so that might be how the system
represents the 2 logical (USB2/USB3) root hubs - each as its own
separate bus.
-George
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
Ross
On 06/17/2015 12:03 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06/16/2015 06:51 PM, Ross Philipson wrote:
On 06/16/2015 12:39 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 06/16/2015 05:32 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
I have just discovered that the value used in /dev/disk/by-path is not
from sysfs, or at least, not directly.
udev
ere h is NFIT Device Handle for this NVDIMM
> Method (_DSM, ...) {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> ...
>}
> }
>
> For each NVDIMM device defined in NFIT, there is a ACPI namespace device
&g
On 02/24/2016 11:42 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 02/24/16 09:00, Ross Philipson wrote:
> [...]
>>> For each NVDIMM device defined in NFIT, there is a ACPI namespace device
>>> (e.g. NVD0, NVD1) under the root NVDIMM device (NVDR). Because the
>>> number of vNV
the vhd_read_block function it is correct.
Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson
---
diff --git a/tools/blktap2/vhd/lib/libvhd.c b/tools/blktap2/vhd/lib/libvhd.c
index 1fd5b4e..4ebe012 100644
--- a/tools/blktap2/vhd/lib/libvhd.c
+++ b/tools/blktap2/vhd/lib/libvhd.c
@@ -2188,7 +2188,7 @@ vhd_write_block
list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
Ross Philipson
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 05/29/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Philipson [mailto:ross.philip...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell; Paul Durrant
Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel; Jan Beulich; Ian Jackson
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7
On 05/29/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Philipson [mailto:ross.philip...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2015 16:35
To: Ian Campbell; Paul Durrant
Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel; Jan Beulich; Ian Jackson
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ACPI shutdown unreliable with win7
erate any AML on the fly and create SSDTs.
Anyway just FYI in case this is helpful.
~Andrew
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
Ross Philipson
___
Xen-de
On 02/05/2016 08:43 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 02/05/16 09:40, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 09:09 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> [...]
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>> There has to be a single entity responsible for collating the eventual
>>>
s late next week ?
>
> Ian.
I was around when this was first created. It requires bits in QEMU to
make it work which I don't think were ever upstreamed. It is also tied
to one of the ACPI SSDTs. If you are removing it you may need to look
into that module too
19 matches
Mail list logo
