On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
>>
>> Can we use the read-only GDT here? When expanding the virtual address
>> for 64-bit system descriptors, isn't it sufficient to check (d->s == 0
>&g
Can we use the read-only GDT here? When expanding the virtual address
for 64-bit system descriptors, isn't it sufficient to check (d->s == 0
&& d->type != 0)?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> The KVM segment_base function is confusing. This patch replaces integers
> with