Hi, all!
We are once again faced with the null-domains problem.
At this moment we have xen node with 49 null-domains and if I create new
domain and shutdown it I w'll get a new one null-domain.
All blkback and netback kernel process are exists. There is no qemu
process running.
I can't delet
Mon, 2014-12-01 at 12:48 +0300, Alexey wrote:
Hi, all!
We are once again faced with the null-domains problem.
At this moment we have xen node with 49 null-domains and if I create
new
domain and shutdown it I w'll get a new one null-domain.
All blkback and netback kernel process are ex
What does "xenstore-ls -fp" say?
# xenstore-ls -fp
/tool = "" (n0)
/tool/xenstored = "" (n0)
/local = "" (n0)
/local/domain = "" (n0)
/local/domain/0 = "" (n0)
/local/domain/0/name = "Domain-0" (n0)
/local/domain/0/domid = "0" (n0)
/local/domain/0/libxl = "" (n0)
/local/domain/0/l
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:56:06 +0100
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/08/17 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.08.17 at 20:47, wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> As per Andrew [Cooper]'s suggestion, writing here instead of #xen on
> >> Freenode.
> >>
> >> I'm trying out Xen (4.9.0) with OVMF (r21243.38
Stefano,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > The patch modifies the behavior in which MapCacheEntry's are added to
> > the list, avoiding duplicates.
>
> I take that the idea is to always go through the whole list to check for
> duplicate locked entries, rig
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> My expectation is that unlocked mappings are much more frequent than
> locked mappings. Also, I expect that only very rarely we'll be able to
> reuse locked mappings. Over the course of a VM lifetime, it seems to me
> that walki
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:57:55 +
"Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
> On an intel skylake machine with upstream qemu, if I add
> "rdm=strategy=host, policy=strict" to hvm.cfg, win 8.1 DomU couldn't boot
> up and continues reboot.
>
> Steps to reproduce this issue:
>
> 1) Boot xen with iommu=1
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:57:55 +
> "Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
>
> > On an intel skylake machine with upstream qemu, if I add
> > "rdm=strategy=host, policy=strict" to hvm.cfg, win 8.1 DomU couldn't
> > boot up and continues reboot.
> >
> > Steps to reproduce this issue:
> >
> > 1) Boot x
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 08:07:02 +
"Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
> [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> Indeed, if I set mmi_hole >= 4G - RMRR_Base, this could fix my issue.
> For this I still have two questions, could you help me ?
> 1) If hvmloader do low memory relocation, hvmloader a
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:53:16 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> > [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> > Indeed, if I set mmi_hole >= 4G - RMRR_Base, this could fix my issue.
> > For this I still have two questions, could you help me ?
> > 1) If hvmloader do low memory relocation, hvmloa
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:01:39 +0100
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/07/17 17:42, Alexey G wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:53:16 +0100
> > Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >>> [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> >>> Indeed, if
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:39:08 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> > But, the problem is that overall MMIO hole(s) requirements are not known
> > exactly at the time the HVM domain being created. Some PCI devices will
> > be emulated, some will be merely passed through and yet there will be
> > some RMRR
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:13:17 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >> The algorithm implemented in hvmloader for that is not complicated and
> >> can be moved to libxl easily. What we can do is to provision a hole big
> >> enough to include all the initially assigned PCI devices. We can also
> >> account
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I noticed that Xen does not boot on Intel Atom E3815. The system is a
> Dell Edge Gateway 3003:
>
> http://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/shared-content/data-sheets/en/Documents/Dell_Edge_Gateway_3000_Series_spec_shee
Hi,
> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:56PM -0400, Jason Dickens wrote:
> >>> I would like to inquire about q35 support in Xen? As far as I have been
> >>> able to tell, this has not been done? In the Xen version that I've been
> >>> working with (4.4), libxl_dm overrides any "-machine" argument
Hi,
> I saw Anthony's patch, but your extension patch seems still in
> development. Do you have plan to upstream it? I'm also interested in
> this basically I want full PCI-e passthru capability (Current Xen does
> support passthru a PCI-e device but guest can't see configuration offset
> 256-4095
, resulting in a wrong MapCacheEntry being unmapped while DMA
operation which uses it is still active. The above example must
be extended by one more DMA transfer in order to allow unmapping as the
first mapping in the list is sort of resident.
The patch modifies the behavior in which MapCacheEntr
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:39:32 +0800
Yi Sun wrote:
> Hi, Alexey,
>
> Have you submitted the patches? If yes, could you please share the link?
Sorry, had a lot of work recently -- so far I've managed to submit only the
bugfix for mentioned xen-mapcache issue with emulated AHCI
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:12 +0800
Yi Sun wrote:
> On 17-09-15 23:12:58, Alexey G wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:39:32 +0800
> > Yi Sun wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Alexey,
> > >
> > > Have you submitted the patches? If yes, could you please shar
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:36:02 +0800
hrg wrote:
Hi,
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:55 PM, hrg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, hrg wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In xen_map_cache_unlocked(), map to guest memory maybe in entry->next
> >> instead of first level entry (if map to rom other than
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, hrg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, hrg wrote:
> > >> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 a
).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
index 4e56a27f9689..fab0d4b42f58 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netbac
On 24.11.2014 13:00, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:56:28AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>> If xenvif_alloc() failes, netback_probe() reports success as well as
>> "online" uevent is emitted. It does not make any sense, but it just
> Sorry, I don't
: Alexey Khoroshilov
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
index 4e56a27f9689..fab0d4b42f58 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers
24 matches
Mail list logo
