[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 104570: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104570 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104570/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 104308 Regressions whi

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 68412: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken

2017-01-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68412 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68412/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-armhf-xsm 3 host-install(3) br

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 104587: all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104587 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104587/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen e225a1c7c06037e4f938efa43d4407e7abb088c1 baseline version: xen ac94

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 104575: all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104575 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104575/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 44175ee77f0c4492e26718212cee90dd4d0f511d baseline version: ovmf aa961dea1e199d23d9b76

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 104573: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104573 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104573/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 14 guest-saverestorefail REGR. vs. 103805 test-amd64-amd6

Re: [Xen-devel] all packets from HVM guests to PV guests on the same host being dropped

2017-01-22 Thread Sherrard Burton
anyone? On 01/13/2017 08:33 AM, Sherrard Burton wrote: please forgive the cross-posting. having not had much luck on the xen-users list, and having seen similarly-complex threads on this list, i thought i'd see if anyone here had any ideas or pointers. TL;DR all packets are being dropped in a d

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 104572: tolerable FAIL

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104572 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104572/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 16 rumprun-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat fail pass in 104513 test-armhf-arm

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 104579: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104579 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104579/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 104401 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 1

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: do not set msr_tsc_adjust on hvm_set_guest_tsc_fixed

2017-01-22 Thread Joao Martins
On 01/20/2017 11:51 PM, Joao Martins wrote: > Commit 6e03363 ("x86: Implement TSC adjust feature for HVM guest") > implemented TSC_ADJUST MSR for hvm guests. Though while booting > an HVM guest the boot CPU would have a value set with delta_tsc - > guest tsc while secondary CPUS would have 0. For e

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104578: regressions - FAIL

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104578 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104578/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 20 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 59254 build-armh

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 68414: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken

2017-01-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68414 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68414/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-armhf-xsm 3 host-install(3) b

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 104589: all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104589 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104589/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 70420e31a04b56f99c1306e281434532a86bde70 baseline version: ovmf 44175ee77f0c4492e2671

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 104585: tolerable trouble: broken/fail/pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104585 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104585/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 104570 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-r

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68415: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken

2017-01-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68415 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68415/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-i3863 host-install(3) broken bas

Re: [Xen-devel] PVH CPU hotplug design document

2017-01-22 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/18/2017 08:25 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.01.17 at 12:54, wrote: So, would it be fine to start a PVH Dom0 with as many vCPUs as what's returned from dom0_max_vcpus, and mark them as enabled in the MADT. That's basically all we need in order to match current PV Dom0 functionality? Yes,

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 104590: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104590 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104590/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail in 104573 pass in 104590 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing baseline-only test] 68417: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken

2017-01-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68417 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68417/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-armhf 3 host-install(3)

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 104600: all pass - PUSHED

2017-01-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 104600 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104600/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf f3fa35a00233b6f2e7653b3b8c3e2b28b8ecbe7f baseline version: ovmf 70420e31a04b56f99c130

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] docs: clarify xl mem-max semantics

2017-01-22 Thread Juergen Gross
On 21/01/17 00:15, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 01/20/2017 02:54 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> The information given in the xl man page for the mem-max command is >> rather brief. Expand it in order to let the reader understand what it >> is really doing. >> >> As the related libxl function libxl_domain_se

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68418: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken

2017-01-22 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68418 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68418/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-i3863 host-install(3) broken bas