flight 102404 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102404/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 102375
test-armhf-armhf-libvir
flight 68065 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68065/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail like
68028
test-amd64-
I guess it is an old book!!! Is it OK in your idea? just C Programming needed?
On Friday, November 18, 2016 1:41 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:45:44PM +, Jason Long wrote:
> Thank you.
> If you find amy book or other useful information then inform me.
About C
I'm thankful if you working on Xen Wiki more and thinking about interested
beginners like us. If you did anything please email me.
Thank you.
On Friday, November 18, 2016 3:16 PM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 10:25 +, Jason Long wrote:
> Hello developers.
> I have a reques
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 07:04:15PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Sending again, this time, with Anthony's and xen-devel address spelled
> right. Sorry!! :-(
> ---
> Hello to you, various pseudo-random people,
>
> It's not my field of expertise, so bear with
flight 102408 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102408/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pair 22 guest-migrate/dst_host/src_host fail in 102393 pass in
102408
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rh
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I briefly mentioned this at an evening event during the KVM Forum / Xen Dev
> Summit, but the list is certainly a better place to discuss such a topic.
> What do folks think about finally removing the old, legacy, xend-based
On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On 18/11/2016 09:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 18/11/16 13:36, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Hello
I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Her
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Commit 9c17d96500f7 ("xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to
> NUMA balancing") set VM_IO flag to prevent grant maps from being
> subjected to NUMA balancing.
>
> It was discovered recently that this flag causes get_user_pages() to
> always f
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 05:27 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 11/18/2016 04:51 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >>> Hmm, sorry, but this seems overcomplicated to me: ingenious, but an
> >>> unusual use of the ->get_policy
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 04:51 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Hmm, sorry, but this seems overcomplicated to me: ingenious, but an
> > unusual use of the ->get_policy method, which is a little worrying,
> > since it has only been used for shmem (+ shm and kernfs) unti
Hello,
I've reinstalled xen from ports on FreeBSD-11.0
and it seems xenlight.pc is not being installed to
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/ directory.
root@controller:/usr/ports/devel/libvirt # find /usr/ -type f -name xenlight.pc
/usr/local/share/pkgconfig/xenlight.pc
root@controller:/usr/port
Most error branches following the call to kmalloc contain
a call to kfree. This patch add these calls where they are
missing.
This issue was found with Hector.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Lambert
---
drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsif
flight 102412 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102412/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101909
test-amd64-amd64-
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68067 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68067/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 14 leak-chec
flight 102436 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102436/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101909
test-amd64-amd64-
Last night on a 288GiB server with less than 64GiB of 32 bit
domUs, we used the standard xendomains script which starts VMs
in alphabetical order.
Some 32 bit domUs at the very end were unable to start. The
error message we received is the following:
xc: error: panic: xc_dom_x86.c:944: arch_setup
17 matches
Mail list logo
