On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:07:08PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 10:49 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:18:48PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 18:44 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> > If the system is not overbooked, it's a bit strange tha
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:44:17PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>[using xendevel correct address]
>>
>>On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 16:54 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:41 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I'm not surprised
flight 100994 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100994/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 100992
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-wi
flight 100995 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100995/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 100962
Tests which did not suc
On September 17, 2016 1:36:49 AM EDT, #PATHANGI JANARDHANAN JATINSHRAVAN#
wrote:
>Hi,
> Sorry for the blank email previously.
>
>
>I am trying to modify netback.c in the Linux Kernel and Observe the
>changes. I've cloned the latest Linux Kernel with Git, checked out
>version 4.7.0 and compile
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 67725 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67725/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 6 xen-boot
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 67724 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67724/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-h
From: Filipe Manco
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:10:46 +0200
> In case of error during netback_probe() (e.g. an entry missing on the
> xenstore) netback_remove() is called on the new device, which will set
> the device backend state to XenbusStateClosed by calling
> set_backend_state(). However, the
flight 67726 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67726/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-stretch-netboot-pvgrub 3 host-install(3) b
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Yi Sun wrote:
>
> Design document is below:
> ===
> % Intel L2 Cache Allocation Technology (L2 CAT) Feature
> % Revision 1.0
>
> \clearpage
>
> Hi all,
>
> We plan to bring a new PSR (Platform Shar
On 09/15/16 19:51, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Setting response flags in vm_event are only ever safe if the vCPUs are paused.
> To reflect this we move all checks within the if block that already checks
> whether this is the case. Checks that are only supported on one architecture
> we relocate the bi
On 09/15/16 19:51, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> When emulating instructions Xen's emulator maintains a small i-cache fetched
> from the guest memory. This patch extends the vm_event interface to allow
> overwriting this i-cache via a buffer returned in the vm_event response.
>
> When responding to a S
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> On 09/15/16 19:51, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> When emulating instructions Xen's emulator maintains a small i-cache fetched
>> from the guest memory. This patch extends the vm_event interface to allow
>> overwriting this i-cache via a buffer
On 16-09-17 11:31:54, Meng Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Yi Sun wrote:
> >
> > Design document is below:
> > ===
> > % Intel L2 Cache Allocation Technology (L2 CAT) Feature
> > % Revision 1.0
> >
> > \clearpage
> >
Hi,
When I compile xen with the latest commit in RHEL 6.7, it failed when make
tools. Errors showed when running edk2 build for OvmfPkgX64.
Bisected and this error occurred from commit
8c8b6fb02342f7aa78e611a5f0f63dcf8fbf48f2.
commit 8c8b6fb02342f7aa78e611a5f0f63dcf8fbf48f2
Author: Wei Liu mail
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>[using xendevel correct address]
>
>On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 16:54 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:41 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm not surprised by that. Yet, I'd be interested in hearing more
>> > about this
16 matches
Mail list logo