[Xen-devel] xen 4.7.0-rc6 dom0 built & packaged for fc24

Hello, This is an unofficial build of 4.7-rc6 for fc24. No part of the xen tree is disabled, unlike the official fc24/rawhide builds. Packages & SRPM are here: http://107.185.144.55/xen/fedora/47x/ Xen install trace here: http://107.185.144.55/xen/fedora/47x/setup/x47_install_trace Xen dom0 inf

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing bisection] complete build-amd64-libvirt

branch xen-4.3-testing xenbranch xen-4.3-testing job build-amd64-libvirt testid libvirt-build Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.gi

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 95913: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 95913 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95913/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 guest-saver

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95911: regressions - FAIL

flight 95911 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95911/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 80927 build-i

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95905: regressions - FAIL

flight 95905 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95905/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 95929: all pass - PUSHED

flight 95929 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95929/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed version targeted for testing: xen 08754333892407f415045c05659783baeb8fc5d4 baseline version: xen d337764d9b8e89eb9c

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 95909: regressions - FAIL

flight 95909 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95909/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 94856 test-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95930: regressions - FAIL

flight 95930 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95930/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 80927 build-i

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 95921: tolerable FAIL

flight 95921 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95921/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail like 95893 build-i386-rumpuserxen

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95935: regressions - FAIL

flight 95935 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95935/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing bisection] complete build-i386-libvirt

branch xen-4.3-testing xenbranch xen-4.3-testing job build-i386-libvirt testid libvirt-build Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 95940: regressions - FAIL

flight 95940 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95940/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 94856 test-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95952: regressions - FAIL

flight 95952 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95952/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 80927 build-i

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/pciback: Update data filter intersection logic.

Follow up on http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/436000#436000 Using http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2008/08/15/intersection-of-1d-segments as reference. New value |---| f1f5 |---| |-| f2

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95961: regressions - FAIL

flight 95961 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95961/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95968: regressions - FAIL

flight 95968 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95968/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 80927 build-i

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 01/14] libxl/arm: Fix the function name in error log

On 2016/6/17 18:46, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:25:05PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:02:53PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >>> > > From: Shannon Zhao >>> > > >>> > > It should be xc_dom_devicetree_mem instead of xc_dom_devicetree_file. >>> > > >>> > > Sign

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 95967: regressions - FAIL

flight 95967 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95967/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 94856 test-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95976: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 95976 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95976/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 80927 build-i

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95974: regressions - FAIL

flight 95974 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95974/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/15] flask/policy: split into modules

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > This makes it easier to enable or disable parts of the XSM policy. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein -- Doug Goldstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/15] flask/policy: split out rules for system_r

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > When the all_system_role module is enabled, any domain type can be > created using the system_r role, which was the default. When it is > disabled, domains not using the default types (dom0_t and domU_t) must > use another role such as vm_r. > > Signed-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/15] flask/policy: remove unused support for binary modules

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein -- Doug Goldstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-deve

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/15] flask/policy: xenstore stubdom policy

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > This adds the xenstore_t type to the example policy for use by a > xenstore stub domain. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein -- Doug Goldstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/15] flask/policy: move user definitions and constraints into modules

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > This also renames the example users created by vm_role. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein (Your clarification to Konrad helped me as well) -- Doug Goldstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/15] flask/policy: remove unused example

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > The access vectors defined here have never been used by xenstore. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf Reviewed-by: Doug Goldstein -- Doug Goldstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/15] XSM/FLASK updates for 4.8

On 6/9/16 9:47 AM, Daniel De Graaf wrote: > Some of these patches have been posted before (patch 11 was posted in > 2014; an earlier variant of 1-6 and 15 were posted recently as RFC). > The rest are mostly removal of unused code or other cleanup. > > FLASK policy updates: > [PATCH 01/15] flask/po

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: fix qdisk BLKIF_OP_DISCARD for 32/64 word size mix

On 17/06/16 18:10, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Juergen Gross [mailto:jgr...@suse.com] >>> Sent: 17 June 2016 11:40 >>> To: Paul Durrant; Jan Beulich >>> Cc: Anthony Perard; xen-devel; sstabell...@kernel.org; qemu- >>>

[Xen-devel] Question about scrub_heap_pages

Hi I am studying xen memory setup I am wondering the job of scrub heap pages in setup_mm If i see the code, it clear unallocated page by setting them to 0 using memset instruction But it looks unneccessary assuming unallocated page will be written to valid data when it is qllocated Is there spe

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v11 3/3] vt-d: fix vt-d Device-TLB flush timeout issue (+ crash logic )

On June 18, 2016 5:54 PM, Xu, Quan wrote: > On June 17, 2016 9:35 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > On 17/06/16 09:51, Xu, Quan wrote: > > > + arm/amd maintainers.. > > > > > > On June 01, 2016 5:05 PM, Xu, Quan wrote: > > >> If Device-TLB flush timed out, we hide the target ATS device > > >> immediat

Re: [Xen-devel] Issues with PCI-Passtrough (VT-d) in HVM with Xen 4.6

>>> On 18.06.16 at 05:24, wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 15.06.16 at 12:45, wrote: >> > In reply to - >> > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-06/msg00622.html >> > >> > HI, I am working with Jurgen on the issue, as per Jan's request I tried