[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 92533: regressions - FAIL

flight 92533 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92533/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 91479 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 92560: all pass - PUSHED

flight 92560 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92560/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed version targeted for testing: xen e0ec0a717d882ff0c0935b4893792d6aa95df3ef baseline version: xen f3a7ca02400d1c416e

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 44362: tolerable FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 44362 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/44362/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-build

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92537: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92537 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92537/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 878

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 92531: regressions - FAIL

flight 92531 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92531/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 60684 build-amd6

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 92532: regressions - FAIL

flight 92532 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92532/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-amd64-xl

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92545: regressions - FAIL

flight 92545 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92545/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovm

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 92543: tolerable FAIL

flight 92543 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92543/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail like 92456 build-i386-rumpuserxen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] xen/hvmlite: Bootstrap HVMlite guest

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > Start HVMlite guest at XEN_ELFNOTE_PHYS32_ENTRY address. Setup hypercall > page, initialize boot_params, enable early page tables. > > Since this stub is executed before kernel entry point we cannot use > variables in .bss which is

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92578: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92578 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92578/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 878

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92600: regressions - FAIL

flight 92600 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92600/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8.1 14/27] xsplice, symbols: Implement symbol name resolution on address.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:18:16AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 22.04.16 at 13:08, wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:50:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 22.04.16 at 12:28, wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:08:10AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >> >>> On 22.04.16 at 10:

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92615: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92615 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92615/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 878

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 92618: regressions - FAIL

flight 92618 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92618/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovm

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 92645: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 92645 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/92645/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 878

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8.1 14/27] xsplice, symbols: Implement symbol name resolution on address.

On 04/22/2016 10:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: As per my earlier reply to Konrad, there must be more to this. I.e. "normal" local symbols won't get dropped together with relocations referencing them getting resolved. Correct. These .LCx symbols only cover .rodata.* sections. Any other loc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V7 1/3] x86/xsaves: fix overwriting between non-lazy/lazy xsaves

>>> On 31.03.16 at 10:57, wrote: > +#define XRSTOR(pfx) \ > +if ( v->arch.xcr0_accum & XSTATE_XSAVES_ONLY ) \ > +{ \ > +if ( unlikely(!(ptr->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv & \ > +XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED)) ) \ > +ptr->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv