[Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: cover non-x86 vm_event files

2016-01-31 Thread Razvan Cojocaru
This patch covers modifications to xen/arch/*/vm_event.c, in order to include ARM vm_event maintainership. Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru --- MAINTAINERS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7c1bf82..b36d9be 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 79450: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79450 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79450/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 59254 build-i386-rumpuserxe

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 test] 79465: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79465 linux-3.10 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79465/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 78980 build-amd64-rumpuserxe

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 79485: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79485 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79485/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65543 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: cover non-x86 vm_event files

2016-01-31 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > This patch covers modifications to xen/arch/*/vm_event.c, in order > to include ARM vm_event maintainership. > > Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru > Once vm_event.c is added to ARM: Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +-

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 79502: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79502 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79502/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i3865 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 79422 Regressions which ar

Re: [Xen-devel] [iGVT-g] [vfio-users] [PATCH v3 00/11] igd passthrough chipset tweaks

2016-01-31 Thread Alex Williamson
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 01:18 +, Kay, Allen M wrote: >  > > -Original Message- > > From: iGVT-g [mailto:igvt-g-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Alex > > Williamson > > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:00 AM > > To: Gerd Hoffmann > > Cc: igv...@ml01.01.org; xen-de...@lists.xensource.com

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:01:00AM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > Also, wasn't Christoph looking at making per-device DMA ops more > generic instead of an 'archdata' thing on basically every platform? Or > did I just imagine that part? What I've done for 4.5 is to switch all architectures to use

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/10] vring: Use the DMA API on Xen

2016-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:34:59AM +, David Vrabel wrote: > On 29/01/16 02:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > > --- > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/driver

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:31:13PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by > module option. > > This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's > off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. > > To the Xen people

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/10] vring: Use the DMA API on Xen

2016-01-31 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:34:59AM +, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 29/01/16 02:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski >> > --- >> > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 >> > 1 file changed, 12 inser

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again

2016-01-31 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:31:13PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by >> module option. >> >> This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's >> off by

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/10] vring: Use the DMA API on Xen

2016-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:13:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:34:59AM +, David Vrabel wrote: > >> On 29/01/16 02:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > >> > --- > >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 09/10] vring: Use the DMA API on Xen

2016-01-31 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:13:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:34:59AM +, David Vrabel wrote: >> >> On 29/01/16 02:31, Andy Lutomirski

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 79527: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79527 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79527/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66399 build-i386-rumpuserxen

[Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

2016-01-31 Thread PGNet Dev
I run Xen 4.6 Dom0 rpm -qa | egrep -i "kernel-default-4|xen-4" kernel-default-devel-4.4.0-8.1.g9f68b90.x86_64 xen-4.6.0_08-405.1.x86_64 My guests are currently HVM in PVHVM mode; I'm exploring PVH. IIUC, for 4.6, this doc http://xenbits.xen.org/d

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 79547: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79547 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79547/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 60684 build-amd6

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

2016-01-31 Thread PGNet Dev
In any case, the !st issue, prior to any guest being launched, simply adding @ GRUBG cfg -GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN=" ..." +GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN=" dom0pvh ..." causes boot fail, ... (XEN) [2016-01-31 19:28:09] d0v0 EPT violation 0x1aa (-w-/r-x) gpa 0x00f100054c mfn 0xf15 (XEN) [2016-01-31 1

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 79562: regressions - FAIL

2016-01-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 79562 linux-3.14 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/79562/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 78986 build-amd64-rumpuserxe

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen: sched: convert RTDS from time to event driven model

2016-01-31 Thread Tianyang Chen
v4 is meant for discussion on the addition of replq. Changes since v3: removed running queue. added repl queue to keep track of repl events. timer is now per scheduler. timer is init on a valid cpu in a cpupool. Bugs to be fixed: Cpupool and locks. When a pcpu is r

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] Remove PV superpage support (v1).

2016-01-31 Thread Juergen Gross
On 29/01/16 17:46, Jan Beulich wrote: On 29.01.16 at 17:26, wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:00:15AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 29.01.16 at 16:30, wrote: I am hoping the maintainers can guide me in how they would like: - Deal with documentation? I removed the allowsup

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 12/18] tools/libx{l, c}: add back channel to libxc

2016-01-31 Thread Wen Congyang
On 01/30/2016 12:38 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: >> In COLO mode, both VMs are running, and are considered in sync if the >> visible network traffic is identical. After some time, they fall out of >> sync. >> >> At this point, the

[Xen-devel] [RFC Design Doc] Add vNVDIMM support for Xen

2016-01-31 Thread Haozhong Zhang
Hi, The following document describes the design of adding vNVDIMM support for Xen. Any comments are welcome. Thanks, Haozhong Content === 1. Background 1.1 Access Mechanisms: Persistent Memory and Block Window 1.2 ACPI Support 1.2.1 NFIT 1.2.2 _DSM and _FIT 1.3 Namespace 1.4 clwb/cl

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] Add VMX TSC scaling support

2016-01-31 Thread Haozhong Zhang
Hi Jan, On 01/18/16 05:58, Haozhong Zhang wrote: > This patchset adds support for VMX TSC scaling feature which is > available on Intel Skylake Server CPU. The specification of VMX TSC > scaling can be found at > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/timestamp-counter-scaling-virtualiz

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 3/9] libxc: allow creating domains without emulated devices.

2016-01-31 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Dec 07, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Introduce a new flag in xc_dom_image that turns on and off the emulated > devices. This prevents creating the VGA hole, the hvm_info page and the > ioreq server pages. libxl unconditionally sets it to true for all HVM > domains at the moment. > @@ -1428,8

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: shrink 'struct domain', was already PAGE_SIZE

2016-01-31 Thread Corneliu ZUZU
The X86 domain structure already occupied PAGE_SIZE (4096). Looking @ the memory layout of the structure, we could see that overall most was occupied by (used the pahole tool on domain.o): * sizeof(domain.arch) = sizeof(arch_domain) = 3328 bytes. * sizeof(domain.arch.hvm_domain) = 2224 bytes. *

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_wp_ram_ranges.

2016-01-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.01.16 at 15:38, wrote: > On 1/30/2016 12:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 29.01.16 at 11:45, wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >>> @@ -940,6 +940,8 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct >>> hvm_ioreq_server *s, >>> { >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] Remove PV superpage support (v1).

2016-01-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.02.16 at 05:54, wrote: > On 29/01/16 17:46, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 29.01.16 at 17:26, wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:00:15AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 29.01.16 at 16:30, wrote: > I am hoping the maintainers can guide me in how they would like: > - Deal w

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] Add VMX TSC scaling support

2016-01-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.02.16 at 06:50, wrote: > I notice that the first three of this patch series have been > committed. Any comments on other ones? They haven't been forgotten, but I didn't get around to look at (and perhaps commit) them yet. Jan ___ Xen-devel