> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Jordan Justen
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:03 AM
> On 2015-09-09 20:26:54, Andrew Fish wrote:
> > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Jordan Justen
> wrote:
> > > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote:
> > >> So yo
>>> On 09.09.15 at 19:02, wrote:
> Well, now the system is booting but would you have any idea why the system
> only boots with iommu=verbose,debug but not with iommu=1? If I pass iommu=1
> as a boot parameter it fails detecting SATA drives (AHCI) with "ata1.00:
> failed command: IDENTIFY DEVICE"
>>> On 10.09.15 at 07:23, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:55 PM
>>
>> >>> On 09.09.15 at 03:59, wrote:
>> > @@ -2310,12 +2312,16 @@ static int intel_iommu_assign_device(
>> > PCI_DEVFN2(bdf) == devfn &&
>> >
>>> On 10.09.15 at 07:28, wrote:
>> > If the 64 limit was arbitrary then I would suggest increasing it to at
>> > least
>>> 1024 so that
>>> at least 4M of BAR can be mapped in one go and it reduces the overhead by a
>>> factor of 16.
>>
>> 1024 may be a little much, but 256 is certainly a possib
>>> On 10.09.15 at 07:35, wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 23:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.15 at 17:16, wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 21:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.15 at 14:56, wrote:
>>> Can you please explain more why it doesn't scale?
>>> From my point of view, any other future value re
>>> On 10.09.15 at 04:07, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 6:27 PM
>> >>> On 09.09.15 at 10:56, wrote:
>> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 8:55 PM
>> >> >>> On 25.08.15 at 03:57, wr
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel
test guest-start
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-u
From: Shannon Zhao
These EFI stub parameters are used to internal communication between EFI
stub and Linux kernel and EFI stub creates these parameters. But for Xen
on ARM when booting with UEFI, Xen will create a minimal DT providing
these parameters for Dom0 and Dom0 is not only Linux kernel, b
Sort of (the patch has the intended effect, but for its size very
many rough edges).
I guess we need to amend the original parameter, once_mapping_mfns, like
this,
/* xen_once_mapping_mfns: memory mapping mfn bumbers once. */
unsigned int xen_once_mapping_mfns;
size_param("once_mapping_mfns"
On 10 September 2015 at 02:21, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 9/10/2015 12:10 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> I found another issue introduced by the gfx passthrough series on
>> Windows:
>>
>> ../hw/pci-host/piix.o: In function `host_pci_config_read':
>> /root/qemu/hw/pci-host/piix.c:778: undefined re
>>> On 10.09.15 at 10:55, wrote:
>> Sort of (the patch has the intended effect, but for its size very
>> many rough edges).
>>
>
> I guess we need to amend the original parameter, once_mapping_mfns, like
> this,
>
> /* xen_once_mapping_mfns: memory mapping mfn bumbers once. */
> unsigned int x
On 10 September 2015 at 02:12, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 9/9/2015 9:06 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 September 2015 at 18:21, Stefano Stabellini
>>> wrote:
>>> > The following changes since commit
>>> > 8611280505119e296757a60711a88134160
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 4:28 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler h
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:05:53PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > From: Wei Liu
> > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:23:04 +0100
> >
> >> Wei Liu (2):
> >> xen-netback: respect user provided max_queues
> >> xen-netfront: respect u
On 10/09/2015 08:57, Sharma Bhupesh wrote:
> So based on my limited understanding, can't the OVMF driver which
> uses features from some GPL based code, carry a dual license (GPL +
> x11 [MIT]),
No, that would require agreement from the original copyright holder,
which you are not going to get.
From: Eduardo Habkost
Remove arguments that can be found in PCMachineState.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
include/hw/xen/xen.h | 4 ++--
hw/i386/pc_piix.c| 4 +---
hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 4 +---
xen-hvm-stub.c
As you see this short log, "hw/pci-assign: split pci-assign.c", so this
means I just extract something from the original hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c,
and here so I just keep those original head files residing
hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c, and I didn't introduce anything new.
hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c is
flight 37919 distros-debian-jessie real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37919/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 37850
test-am
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:41:59PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote:
> >
> > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen
> > > wrot> > > FWIW, I don't mind if the consensus is that GplDriverPkg must
> > > live in
> > > a separate repo. But, it would be nic
>>> On 10.09.15 at 10:59, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 4:28 PM
>> >>> On 10.09.15 at 04:07, wrote:
>> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 6:27 PM
>> >> >>> On 09.09.15 at 10:56,
xen-host-pci-device.c is only compiled if CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH
was set by configure. That won't be the case on OSX or Windows, where
the Xen headers don't exist.
Okay. This actually shouldn't be enabled on Windows so what about this?
diff --git a/hw/pci-host/piix.c b/hw/pci-host/piix.c
i
flight 61641 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/61641/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd 13 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 60666
test-amd64-i386-xl-qco
On 09/09/2015 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 10.09.15 at 07:35, wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 23:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.09.15 at 17:16, wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 21:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.15 at 14:56, wrote:
>>> Can you please explain more why it doesn't scale?
>>> From my
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 10:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 08:58 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 61301 linux-3.4 real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/61301/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
On 09/10/15 05:05, Zeng, Star wrote:
> On 2015/9/9 18:48, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> me neither :)
>>
>>> but if this (executable code on stack) is
>>> happening in grub is there something which is explicitly forbidden to
>>> UEFI
>>> apps by the UEFI spec?
>>
>> Yes, there is. This small OvmfPkg patch
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 5:26 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler h
On 09/09/15 20:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:25:14PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Commit f48da8b14d04ca87ffcffe68829afd45f926ec6a (xen-netback: fix
>> unlimited guest Rx internal queue and carrier flapping) introduced a
>> regression.
>>
>> The PV frontend in IPXE o
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > xen-host-pci-device.c is only compiled if CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH
> > was set by configure. That won't be the case on OSX or Windows, where
> > the Xen headers don't exist.
> >
>
> Okay. This actually shouldn't be enabled on Windows so what about th
>>> On 10.09.15 at 08:06, wrote:
> The ACPI PM timer is sometimes broken on live migration.
> Since vcpu->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_time is always zero in other than
> "delay for missed ticks mode". Even in "delay for missed ticks mode",
> vcpu's guest_time field is not valid (i.e. zero) when
> the stat
Hi,
I'm not necessarily opposed to the renaming, but I think that this is
the least important thing to standardize for this to work.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> These EFI stub parameters are used to internal communication between EFI
>
>>> On 10.09.15 at 11:33, wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.09.15 at 07:35, wrote:
>> Seems we still cannot get rid of these strncmp()s. Is this acceptable,
>> or should we change "struct cpufreq_driver" to use enum represented
>> driver name as well, or do you have a
>>> On 10.09.15 at 11:41, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 5:26 PM
>> >>> On 10.09.15 at 10:59, wrote:
>> > First, how to check it while waiting to acquire the lock .pi_block_cpu
>> > didn't change?
>>
>> Note the difference between "ch
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > > As you see this short log, "hw/pci-assign: split pci-assign.c", so this
> > > means I just extract something from the original hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c,
> > > and here so I just keep those original head files residing
> > > hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c, an
On 09/10/15 08:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 10.09.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Jordan Justen :
>> Laszlo's email raised the GPL question, but I was not sure what the
>> EDK II community would accept with regards to GPL. Thus ... I asked. I
>> guess I'm getting a better idea with regards to Apple
On 10/09/2015 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 10.09.15 at 11:33, wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.09.15 at 07:35, wrote:
>> Seems we still cannot get rid of these strncmp()s. Is this
>> acceptable, or should we change "struct cpufreq_driver" to use enum
>> represen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linus,
Please git pull the following tag:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git
for-linus-4.3-rc0b-tag
xen: MFN/GFN/BFN terminology changes for 4.3-rc0
- - Use the correct GFN/BFN terms more consistently.
Thanks.
David
arc
Wei Liu (2):
xen-netback: respect user provided max_queues
xen-netfront: respect user provided max_queues
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 7 +--
drivers/net/xen-netfront.c| 7 +--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
__
Originally that parameter was always reset to num_online_cpus during
module initialisation, which renders it useless.
The fix is to only set max_queues to num_online_cpus when user has not
provided a value.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Cc: David Vrabel
---
v3: fix copy-n-paste error to make netfront
Originally that parameter was always reset to num_online_cpus during
module initialisation, which renders it useless.
The fix is to only set max_queues to num_online_cpus when user has not
provided a value.
Reported-by: Johnny Strom
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Reviewed-by: David Vrabel
Acked-by: Ia
>>> On 10.09.15 at 12:10, wrote:
> Ok. If we add this "enum meaning_of_data", the xen_get_cpufreq_para will
> exceed 128Byte, which cannot even pass the compilation. I am not sure how to
> deal with this nicely. Do you have a suggestion?
Currently afaict the structure occupies 14 8-byte slots,
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not necessarily opposed to the renaming, but I think that this is
> the least important thing to standardize for this to work.
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> > From: Shannon Zhao
> >
> > These EFI stub p
CC Michael
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > > xen-host-pci-device.c is only compiled if CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH
> > > was set by configure. That won't be the case on OSX or Windows, where
> > > the Xen headers don't exist.
> > >
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:09:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.09.15 at 07:23, wrote:
> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:55 PM
> >>
> >> >>> On 09.09.15 at 03:59, wrote:
> >> > @@ -2310,12 +2312,16 @@ static int intel_iommu_ass
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> CC Michael
>
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > > > xen-host-pci-device.c is only compiled if CONFIG_XEN_PCI_PASSTHROUGH
> > > > was set by configure. That won't be
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 23:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Originally when user runs ./configure --enable-systemd and systemd
> development library is not available the build system silently disables
> systemd support. This is not in line with normal expectation.
>
> Instead, configure should error out w
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 18:03 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> ... otherwise we have something like:
>
> xl: libxl_create.c:968: initiate_domain_create: Assertion `ret' failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked-by: Ian Campbell
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-d
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 18:03 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> A simple wrapper for XENMEM_get_vnumainfo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked-by: Ian Campbell
Some comments which are not specific to this patch:
> +int xc_domain_getvnuma(xc_interface *xch,
> + uint32_t domid,
> +
Hi,
At 15:06 +0900 on 10 Sep (1441897575), Kouya Shimura wrote:
> The ACPI PM timer is sometimes broken on live migration.
> Since vcpu->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_time is always zero in other than
> "delay for missed ticks mode". Even in "delay for missed ticks mode",
> vcpu's guest_time field is not va
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 23:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Originally when user runs ./configure --enable-systemd and systemd
> > development library is not available the build system silently disables
> > systemd support. This is not in li
Den 10. sep. 2015 08:06, skrev Tian, Kevin:
>> From: Chen, Tiejun
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:47 PM
>>
>> But recently someone was encountering this problem.
>>
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/391684?page=last
>>
>> We'd better figure out a simple way to this regressi
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 21:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:49:16PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 09/09/15 18:03, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > This is due to migration v2 frame record doesn't contain node
> > > information.
> >
> > This isn't a migration v2 bug, and it was similarl
Originally when user runs ./configure --enable-systemd and systemd
development library is not available the build system silently disables
systemd support. This is not in line with normal expectation.
Instead, configure should error out when user has asked for systemd
support but development libra
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:04:10PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 23:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Originally when user runs ./configure --enable-systemd and systemd
> > > development library is not available the buil
Den 10. sep. 2015 13:04, skrev Håkon Alstadheim:
> Den 10. sep. 2015 08:06, skrev Tian, Kevin:
>>> From: Chen, Tiejun
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:47 PM
>>>
>>> But recently someone was encountering this problem.
>>>
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/391684?page=last
>
> > Does Xen not talk to EFI itself and/or give the kernel a virtual EFI
> > interface?
>
> Xen talks to EFI itself but the interface provided to dom0 is somewhat
> different: there are no BootServices (Xen calls ExitBootServices before
> running the kernel), and the RuntimeServices go via hyperca
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > CC Michael
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > > > > xen-host-pci-device.c is only compiled if CONFIG_XEN_P
On 10.09.15 12:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 09/10/15 08:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 10.09.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Jordan Justen :
>
>>> Laszlo's email raised the GPL question, but I was not sure what the
>>> EDK II community would accept with regards to GPL. Thus ... I asked. I
>>> gues
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Does Xen not talk to EFI itself and/or give the kernel a virtual EFI
> > > interface?
> >
> > Xen talks to EFI itself but the interface provided to dom0 is somewhat
> > different: there are no BootServices (Xen calls ExitBootServices before
> > runnin
On 10/09/15 12:32, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:41:56 +0800
> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>> From: Shannon Zhao
>>
>> These EFI stub parameters are used to internal communication between
>> EFI stub and Linux kernel and EFI stub creates these parameters. But
>> for Xen on ARM when boo
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:41:59PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Jordan Justen
> > > > wrot> > > FWIW, I don't mind if the consensus is that GplDriverPkg mus
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > CC Michael
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Chen
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > CC Michael
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015,
El 10/09/15 a les 13.48, Julien Grall ha escrit:
> On 10/09/15 12:32, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:41:56 +0800
>> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> From: Shannon Zhao
>>>
>>> These EFI stub parameters are used to internal communication between
>>> EFI stub and Linux kernel and EFI stub
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:00:35PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:26:21PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29:18AM +0100, Stefano
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:37:57PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Does Xen not talk to EFI itself and/or give the kernel a virtual EFI
> > > > interface?
> > >
> > > Xen talks to EFI itself but the interface provided to dom0 is somewhat
> > > di
> On Sep 10, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10.09.15 12:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 09/10/15 08:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
Am 10.09.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Jordan Justen :
>>
Laszlo's email raised the GPL question, but I was not sure what the
EDK II
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 6:01 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler h
While it appears to be intentional for "xl pci-assignable-remove" to
not re-bind the original driver by default (requires the -r option),
permanently losing the information which driver was originally used
seems bad. Make "add; remove; add; remove -r" re-bind the original
driver by allowing "remove
>>> On 10.09.15 at 14:34, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 6:01 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
>> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
>> Subject: RE:
Hello,
I just write to signal a bug and its solution. I installed the 14.04 LTS
ubuntu version and installed the xen version through synaptic. As I'm
developping modules for Xen I also installed the xen dev package. The
installed Xen version is 4.4.2.
I tried to compile one of my C files includin
>>> On 10.09.15 at 13:37, wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Why can't Xen give a virtual EFI interface to Dom0 / guests? e.g.
>> create pages of RuntimeServicesCode that are trivial assembly shims
>> doing hypercalls, and plumb these into the virtual EFI memory map and
>> tables
On 10/09/15 13:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 10/09/15 a les 13.48, Julien Grall ha escrit:
>> On 10/09/15 12:32, Andrew Turner wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:41:56 +0800
>>> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>
From: Shannon Zhao
These EFI stub parameters are used to internal communication
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:15 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > In any case this should be separate from the shim ABI discussion.
>
> I disagree; I think this is very much relevant to the ABI discussion.
> That's not to say that I insist on a particular approach, but I think
> that they need to be con
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:45 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler h
On 09/10/2015 03:52 PM, Sébastien Frémal wrote:
> I just write to signal a bug and its solution. I installed the 14.04 LTS
> ubuntu version and installed the xen version through synaptic. As I'm
> developping modules for Xen I also installed the xen dev package. The
> installed Xen version is 4.4.2
>>> On 10.09.15 at 14:58, wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:15 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> > In any case this should be separate from the shim ABI discussion.
>>
>> I disagree; I think this is very much relevant to the ABI discussion.
>> That's not to say that I insist on a particular approa
>>> On 10.09.15 at 14:58, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:45 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
>> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
>> Subject: RE:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:15 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler h
> Am 10.09.2015 um 14:17 schrieb Andrew Fish :
>
>
>> On Sep 10, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10.09.15 12:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/10/15 08:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Am 10.09.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Jordan Justen :
>>>
> Laszlo's ema
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 07:08 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 10.09.15 at 14:58, wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:15 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > > > In any case this should be separate from the shim ABI discussion.
> > >
> > > I disagree; I think this is very much relevant to the AB
On 10/09/15 11:18, Wei Liu wrote:
> Originally that parameter was always reset to num_online_cpus during
> module initialisation, which renders it useless.
>
> The fix is to only set max_queues to num_online_cpus when user has not
> provided a value.
Reviewed-by: David Vrabel
Tested-by: David Vr
Hi all,
This small series add support for 64KB guests in swiotlb. It's based on
top of my 64KB page granularity support [1].
It has been tested on both 4KB and 64KB page granularity DOM0 by using an
LVM partition for the guest rootfs.
Regards,
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/656797/
Cc: Konrad Rz
Swiotlb is used on ARM64 to support DMA on platform where devices are
not protected by an SMMU. Furthermore it's only enabled for DOM0.
While Xen is always using 4KB page granularity in the stage-2 page table,
Linux ARM64 may either use 4KB or 64KB. This means that a Linux page
can be spanned accr
With 64KB page granularity support, the frame number will be different.
It will be easier to modify the behavior in a single place rather than
in each caller.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: David Vrab
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Using SELinux mount options per default breaks several systems.
> Either the context= mount option is not known at all to the kernel,
> as reported for ArchLinux. Or the default value "none" is unknown to
> SELinux, as reported for Fedora. In
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:33:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 01:29 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>On 09/09/2015 01:03 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>>This is due to migration v2 frame record doesn't contain node
> >>>informatio
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:37:57PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > > Does Xen not talk to EFI itself and/or give the kernel a virtual EFI
> > > > > interface?
> > > >
> > > > Xen talks to EFI itself bu
>>> On 10.09.15 at 15:27, wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:15 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin;
>> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir Fraser
>> Subject: RE:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Using SELinux mount options per default breaks several systems.
> > Either the context= mount option is not known at all to the kernel,
> > as reported for ArchLinux. Or the default value "none" i
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > In any case this should be separate from the shim ABI discussion.
> >
> > I disagree; I think this is very much relevant to the ABI discussion.
> > That's not to say that I insist on a particular approach, but I think
> > th
On 09/10/2015 03:13 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>> Using SELinux mount options per default breaks several systems.
>>> Either the context= mount option is not known at all to the kernel,
>>> as reporte
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 12:25 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> > The shell wrapper in xenstored.service does not handle XENSTORE_TRACE.
>> >
>> > Create a separate wrapper script which is used in the sysv runle
flight 61652 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/61652/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581
Tests which are failin
From: Kouya Shimura
The ACPI PM timer is sometimes broken on live migration.
Since vcpu->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_time is always zero in other than
"delay for missed ticks mode". Even in "delay for missed ticks mode",
vcpu's guest_time field is not valid (i.e. zero) when
the state of vcpu is "blocked"
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:52:25PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:37:57PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > > > Does Xen not talk to EFI itself and/or give the kernel a
Wei Liu (3):
libxc: introduce xc_domain_getvnuma
xl/libxl: disallow saving a guest with vNUMA configured
xl: handle empty vnuma configuration
docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 | 2 ++
tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h | 18 +++
tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 54 +++
This is because the migration stream does not preserve node information.
Note this is not a regression for migration v2 vs legacy migration
because neither of them preserve node information.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: andrew.coop...@citrix.com
v3:
1. Update manpage, code comment and commit
When user specifies vnuma = [], we need to skip the whole parser
function, otherwise the parser sets b_info->max_memkb to garbage value.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
A simple wrapper for XENMEM_get_vnumainfo.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked-by: Ian Campbell
---
tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h | 18 +++
tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 54 +++
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xe
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:19:35PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 12:25 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >> > The shell wrapper in xenstored.service does not handle XENSTORE_TRACE.
>
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
