flight 53849 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53849/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 15
rumpuserxen-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat fail REGR. vs. 503
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 03:10 +, osstest service user wrote:
> flight 53854 libvirt real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53854/
>
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 11 guest-start
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 22:42 +, osstest service user wrote:
> flight 53825 ovmf real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53825/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 11:33 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In 952944f7 "QEMU_TAG update" my tag update script mangled the
> machinery which sets QEMU_TRADITIONAL_REVISION, by replacing the first
> assignment to QEMU_TRADITIONAL_REVISION it found rather than the one
> which ought to have been replaced.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> On 05/09/2015 02:34 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> @@ -193,6 +200,11 @@ struct vm_event_xsetbv {
> >>> uint64_t value;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +struct vm_event_emul_read_data {
> >>> +uint32_t size;
> >>> +
flight 53888 rumpuserxen real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53888/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-rumpuserxen 5 rumpuserxen-build fail REGR. vs. 33866
build-i386-rumpuserxe
Hi Julien,
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On 07/04/15 08:33, Chen Baozi wrote:
> > From: Chen Baozi
> >
> > On arm64, either firmware or xen's smp_up_cpu gate uses WFE on secondary
> > cpus to stand-by when booting. Thus, using SEV is enough for the
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:01:12PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Currently, the GICv3 driver is only able to send an SGI when the cpumask
> is provided. Although with the modes SGI_TARGET_OTHERS and SGI_TARGET_SELF,
> no cpumask is provided. Any usage of those modes will crash the hypersivor.
>
> R
flight 53875 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53875/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate fail like 50407
Tests which did not succee
Hi all,
note that I'm not subscribed to the xen-devel mailing list, but Jan
quoted from this mail of Andrew's in SUSE Bugzilla:
> This is all from a while ago. It is quite possible that we didn't
> actually tested the compatibility case with a 64bit dom0 kernel,
> although I certainly did test e
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 05:47:25PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fabio Fantoni [mailto:fabio.fant...@m2r.biz]
> > Sent: 08 May 2015 16:11
> > To: Paul Durrant; xen-devel; win-pv-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> > Cc: Anthony Perard; Wei Liu; Ian Campbell; Stefano S
On 05/09/2015 11:33 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> Ah yes, I missed the fact that you put it into a union with regs. I
> guess as long as it's the same size as regs it's fine. However, I
> think the union will have to be named.
Sure, I can name it. When I was working on it I was under the impression
flight 53881 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53881/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 53720
Regressions which are
Hi Andrew,
On 08/05/2015 21:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
CC: Ian Campbell
CC: Ian Jackson
CC: Wei Liu
CC: Julien Grall
---
tools/libxc/xc_domain.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c b/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
index 273e1
flight 53884 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53884/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 50405
Regressions which ar
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:31:02PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> For HVM domains, vfb info must be populated in the libxl_domain_build_info
> stuct. Currently this is done in the libxlMakeVfbList function, but IMO
struct
> it would be cleaner to populate the build_info vfb in a separate
> libxlMakeB
flight 53914 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53914/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 50391
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 53933 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53933/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 15 guest-localmigrate.2fail REGR. vs. 36608
Tests which are failin
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 17:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> There seems to be a pvgrub regression somewhere in the range
> 3a28f760508f..123c77937975
The bisector has fingered:
commit 840837907c6186307c19abbec926852ba448facd
Author: Wei Liu
Date: Mon Mar 16 09:52:22 20
19 matches
Mail list logo
