Hi, all:
I have tried PCI-Passthrough to DomU in Xen. However, If we send packets to
DomU for a while, there is chance that the networking of Domu will be
disconnected. The corresponding syslog messages are as shown at the end of mail.
And I found the following analysis at [1], I am wonder
Hi all,
Recently I met an odd performance problem: when I turn on APIC
Virtualization feature (apicv=1), the network performance of a windows
guest become worse.
My test case like this: host only have one windows 2008 R2 HVM
guest running,and this guest has a SR-IOV VF network passth
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 18:19 +0200, Denys Drozdov wrote:
> since context_save executed right from IRQ level. The arm interrupt
> handling differs from x86. ARM is handling context_saved with IRQ
> disabled in CPSR, though x86 has IRQs on. Thus it is failing on ASSERT
> inside spin_lock_irq when ru
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 04:46 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>
>> To make it easier to review the renaming process of mem_event -> vm_event,
>> the process is broken into three pieces, of which this patch is the first.
>> In this patch the vm_event subs
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:07:16AM +, Xu, Quan wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
> > [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Wei Liu
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 8:26 PM
> > To: Chen, Tiejun
> > Cc: Wei Liu; ian.campb...@ci
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 01:52:09PM -0700, Ben Hildred wrote:
> Why do you want the size of a pointer instead of the size of the structure?
Isn't *request_tag the dereferenced pointer, and hence is the size of
the structure, where as before it was the size of a pointer?
--
Len Sorensen
> On Fri,
Why do you want the size of a pointer instead of the size of the structure?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Daniel Kiper
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> grub-core/loader/multiboot_mbi2.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/loader
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:33 PM
> To: Xu, Quan
> Cc: Wei Liu; Chen, Tiejun; ian.campb...@citrix.com; m...@redhat.com; Ian
> Jackson;
> qemu-de...@nongnu.org; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Gerd Hoffmann
> Subject: Re
flight 34018 ovmf real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34018/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 33686
build-i386
flight 34039 ovmf real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34039/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 33686
build-i386
OVMF requires nasm to build.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Cc: Ian Campbell
Cc: Ian Jackson
---
ts-xen-build-prep | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ts-xen-build-prep b/ts-xen-build-prep
index a7d0d03..24a8b25 100755
--- a/ts-xen-build-prep
+++ b/ts-xen-build-prep
@@
flight 34011 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34011/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 33488
test-amd64
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel
test redhat-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
Tree: qemuu git:/
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Justin Weaver wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Dario Faggioli
> wrote:
>>> if ( __vcpu_on_runq(svc) )
>>> +on_runq = 1;
>>> +
>>> +/* If the runqs are different, move svc to trqd. */
>>> +if ( svc->rqd != trqd )
>>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
