Re: [Xen-devel] libxl refactoring, call for discussion

2016-01-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 18:20 +0200, Pavlo Suikov wrote: > Hi Ian, Please don't top post and please use plain text emails, not html. > I'll try to make clear domain restart thing first. Currently there are > only device entries in domain config for frontends with backend paths in > them, e.g.: > >

Re: [Xen-devel] libxl refactoring, call for discussion

2016-01-27 Thread Pavlo Suikov
Hi Ian, I'll try to make clear domain restart thing first. Currently there are only device entries in domain config for frontends with backend paths in them, e.g.: FrontendDomain.cfg: vdevice = [ 'backend=BackendDomain,devid=0,device=/dev/device' ] it is parsed only on frontend domain start, and

Re: [Xen-devel] libxl refactoring, call for discussion

2016-01-27 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:38 +0200, Pavlo Suikov wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I want to bring domain restart question for a discussion. It originates > from DomD restart, but the solution I am about to offer can be quite > generic. > > Problem is, domain specification currently holds only frontend in

Re: [Xen-devel] libxl refactoring, call for discussion

2016-01-27 Thread Pavlo Suikov
Hi again, any thoughts on this topic? Questions, suggestions, criticism? I can make patches to discuss code, but it would rather be handly if I'd be on the same page with everyone here to make something generically useful. Suikov Pavlo GlobalLogic P +x.xxx.xxx. M +38.066.667.1296 S psujkov