On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/17 14:18, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07/02/17 15:59, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/02/2017 13:25, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6
On 08/02/17 14:18, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/02/17 15:59, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/02/2017 13:25, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> One more thing, if
Hi,
On 07/02/17 15:59, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/2017 13:25, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
One more thing, if Xen 4.7 was able to go up to booting Dom0 without any
>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 07/02/2017 13:25, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> One more thing, if Xen 4.7 was able to go up to booting Dom0 without any
>>> patches on a NUMA board. I would recommend to try t
On 07/02/2017 13:25, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
One more thing, if Xen 4.7 was able to go up to booting Dom0 without any
patches on a NUMA board. I would recommend to try to bisect and see if you
can find an offending commit.
Yes, with plain 4
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 07/02/2017 12:47, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/2017 12:41, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Julien Grall
>>> wrote:
On 07/02/2017 11:10, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb
On 07/02/2017 12:47, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/02/2017 12:41, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Julien Grall
wrote:
On 07/02/2017 11:10, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Julien Grall
wrote:
On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
I am seeing
On 07/02/2017 12:41, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/02/2017 11:10, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
I am seeing below panic with NUMA during DT mappings in
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/02/2017 11:10, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
I am seeing below panic with NUMA during DT mappings in
alloc_heap_pages()
>>
On 07/02/2017 11:10, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
I am seeing below panic with NUMA during DT mappings in
alloc_heap_pages()
BUG_ON(pg[i].count_info != PGC_state_free);
However, this issue is not there with
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>
>
> Hello,
>
>>I am seeing below panic with NUMA during DT mappings in
>> alloc_heap_pages()
>> BUG_ON(pg[i].count_info != PGC_state_free);
>> However, this issue is not there with 4.7 ve
On 07/02/2017 08:18, Vijay Kilari wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I am seeing below panic with NUMA during DT mappings in alloc_heap_pages()
BUG_ON(pg[i].count_info != PGC_state_free);
However, this issue is not there with 4.7 version. The same NUMA board
boots fine.
I am a bit confused by what you ar
12 matches
Mail list logo