Hello Julien,
On 05.07.17 19:50, Julien Grall wrote:
Yocto aside, I think updating the wiki pages don't take too long. It
is just adding:
* Adding a point of contact in
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_Manual_Smoke_Test/Results
* Make sure Salvator-X webpage is accurate and does
On 07.07.17 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
You can say it is supported and listing known limitations, not saying
it is fully supported. As you said, there is a long way to end up
fully support.
Got it.
--
*Andrii Anisov*
___
Xen-devel mailing list
X
On 07/07/17 11:47, Andrii Anisov wrote:
Dear Julien,
On 06.07.17 15:35, Julien Grall wrote:
I don't count the chosen node. This could be done via the u-boot
command line, so no need to load a separate DT.
I looked through all available manuals.
Most of them imply significant amount of manua
Dear Julien,
On 06.07.17 15:35, Julien Grall wrote:
I don't count the chosen node. This could be done via the u-boot
command line, so no need to load a separate DT.
I looked through all available manuals.
Most of them imply significant amount of manual actions to start the
system. From one ha
Hi Andrii,
On 06/07/17 13:24, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 06.07.17 14:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Well, I would expect no changes in either in the BSP, kernel,
device-tree when you run with Xen.
Even without adding XEN specific chosen node? Or you do not count it as
a devtree change?
I don't count t
On 06.07.17 14:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Well, I would expect no changes in either in the BSP, kernel,
device-tree when you run with Xen.
Even without adding XEN specific chosen node? Or you do not count it as
a devtree change?
The wiki page gives the false impression that Xen upstream is fully
Hi Andrii,
On 06/07/17 12:31, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 05.07.17 20:18, Julien Grall wrote:
I prefer to say: "This is not supported today because of XXX. With the
following patches, it is possible to boot.". Rather than "This is
supported if you download from this github, I don't give Xen versio
On 05.07.17 20:18, Julien Grall wrote:
I prefer to say: "This is not supported today because of XXX. With the
following patches, it is possible to boot.". Rather than "This is
supported if you download from this github, I don't give Xen version
and don't even mention the patches on top...".
Ac
Hi Andrii,
On 05/07/17 18:00, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 05.07.17 19:50, Julien Grall wrote:
Yocto aside, I think updating the wiki pages don't take too long. It
is just adding:
* Make sure Salvator-X webpage is accurate and doesn't contain
non-upstream pointer (i.e dropping this yocto link co
On 05.07.17 19:50, Julien Grall wrote:
Yocto aside, I think updating the wiki pages don't take too long. It
is just adding:
* Make sure Salvator-X webpage is accurate and doesn't contain
non-upstream pointer (i.e dropping this yocto link contain security
flaw).
I suppose that will not wor
On 05/07/17 17:41, Andrii Anisov wrote:
Julien,
Hi Andrii,
On 05.07.17 19:34, Julien Grall wrote:
I'd like to have my comments (see the discussion on "Xen Community
Call 21/07/16 meeting minutes") before considering acking those two
patches.
Its clear. It is just the first step.
Taking a
Julien,
On 05.07.17 19:34, Julien Grall wrote:
I'd like to have my comments (see the discussion on "Xen Community
Call 21/07/16 meeting minutes") before considering acking those two
patches.
Its clear. It is just the first step.
Taking all discussed actions will take more time.
--
*Andrii
Hi,
Please CC relevant maintainers on those patches.
On 05/07/17 17:29, Andrii Anisov wrote:
These patches add SCIF earlyprintk support as well as a configuration
suitable for R-Car Gen3 SoCs based development boards.
[PATCH 1/2] xen:arm64: Add SCIF UART support for earlyprintk
[PATCH 2/2] x
13 matches
Mail list logo
