>>> On 21.11.17 at 18:00, wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 08:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
>> >
>> > On 21/11/17 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > > > On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>> >
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 08:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
> >
> > On 21/11/17 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > See the code comment being added for why we need this.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin
On 11/21/2017 04:42 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 08:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
>>>
>> The question here is: In what other cases do we expect an RCU
>> callback to possibly touch guest state? I think the common use is
>> to merely free some
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 08:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
> >
> The question here is: In what other cases do we expect an RCU
> callback to possibly touch guest state? I think the common use is
> to merely free some memory in a delayed fashion.
>
> > Those choice
On 11/21/2017 01:22 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
>> See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>>
>> Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> I realize we aren't settled yet on where to put the sync call. The
> discussion appears to h
On 21/11/17 15:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
>> On 21/11/17 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
See the code comment being added for why we need this.
Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>>
>>> I realiz
>>> On 21.11.17 at 15:07, wrote:
> On 21/11/17 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
>>> See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>
>> I realize we aren't settled yet on where to put the sy
On 21/11/17 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.11.17 at 15:49, wrote:
>> See the code comment being added for why we need this.
>>
>> Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> I realize we aren't settled yet on where to put the sync call. The
> discussion appears to have s
