On 16/03/16 03:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2016 3:05 PM, "Andrew Cooper" wrote:
>> On 15/03/2016 21:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Cooper
>>> wrote:
On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> e) Can timing use RDTSC?
>> I don
On Mar 15, 2016 3:05 PM, "Andrew Cooper" wrote:
>
> On 15/03/2016 21:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Cooper
> > wrote:
> >> On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > e) Can timing use RDTSC?
> I don't understand this question in the context
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:14:15PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> While discussing HVMLite with a few people a few questions have come
> up. Since I only really understand a few possible gains with the
> current design I wanted to get clarificaiton on a few which I simply
Just think of baremeta
On 15/03/2016 21:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> e) Can timing use RDTSC?
I don't understand this question in the context of the others. RDTSC
has (as far as I can tell) always be
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
e) Can timing use RDTSC?
>>> I don't understand this question in the context of the others. RDTSC
>>> has (as far as I can tell) always been advertised and available for
>>> guest use. R
On 03/15/2016 05:36 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
On 15/03/2016 21:14, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
While discussing HVMLite with a few people a few questions have come
up. Since I only really understand a few possible gains with the
current desig
On 15/03/2016 21:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>>> e) Can timing use RDTSC?
>> I don't understand this question in the context of the others. RDTSC
>> has (as far as I can tell) always been advertised and available for
>> guest use. RDTSCP is a different matter, and I have half-fixed that
>> bro
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 15/03/2016 21:14, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> While discussing HVMLite with a few people a few questions have come
>> up. Since I only really understand a few possible gains with the
>> current design I wanted to get clarificaiton on a few
On 15/03/2016 21:14, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> While discussing HVMLite with a few people a few questions have come
> up. Since I only really understand a few possible gains with the
> current design I wanted to get clarificaiton on a few which I simply
> have no clue if we stand to gain from them
