On 11/03/2017 06:35 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +0
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Well, with a looping xen-build going on in the guest, I've done 40 local
> migrates with no problems yet.
>
> But Roger -- is this on emulated devices only, no PV drivers?
Yes. None of our Wi
On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Hmm. I wonder whethe
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the mig
On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the migrate. One
>>> could imagine a situation where the storage device model
Kurth
>>> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
>>> ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel >> de...@lists.xenproject.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>&
committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel > de...@lists.xenproject.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Roger Pau Monne
Hi Ian,
On 02/11/17 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock
master (and other tree I mentioned).
I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way
because I base eac
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock
> master (and other tree I mentioned).
I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way
because I base each force push on a test report - so it won't be
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Is there anyway to get that from windows in an automatic way? If not I
> could test that with a Debian guest. In fact it might even be a good
> thing for Linux based guest to be added to the regular m
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
> the osstest db by me) have determined:
>
> * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
> to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it,
> then
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 02 November 2017 09:42
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth
> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
> ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel de...@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit mo
rrant ;
> > committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 02 November 2017 09:15
> To: Roger Pau Monne
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth
> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall
> ; Paul Durrant ;
> committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * Affected hosts differ from unaffected hosts according to cpuid.
> > Roger has repro'd the bug on an unaffected host by masking out
> > certain cpuid bits. There
Hi Ian,
On 11/01/2017 04:54 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
Hi Ian,
Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be
effective in the following sen
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
>
> On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be
> > effective in the following sense: we would only get a "spurious" pas
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
> the osstest db by me) have determined:
>
> * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
> to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then mi
Hi Ian,
Thank you for the detailed e-mail.
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
the osstest db by me) have determined:
* This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
to boot the Windows guest, save
So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in
the osstest db by me) have determined:
* This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is
to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it,
then shut down. (This is from an IRL conversation with Rog
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 01 November 2017 10:48
> To: Roger Pau Monne
> Cc: Julien Grall ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-
> devel ; Lars Kurth ;
> Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu
> Subject: Re: Commit moratorium to staging
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:52:37PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> I have to admit I have no idea why Windows clears the STS power bit
> and then completely ignores it on certain occasions.
>
> I'm also afraid I have no idea how to debug Windows in order to know
> why this event is acknowledged
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49:35AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Master lags 15 days behind staging due to tests failing reliably on some of
> the hardware in osstest (see [1]).
>
> At the moment a force push is not feasible because the same tests passes on
> different hardware (see [2
>>> On 01.06.17 at 19:57, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
>>> On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Is this:
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-
Hi,
On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are having
On 25/05/17 16:54, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
I would like to make another attempt to branch with the RC (4.9 RC7). I
don't want to branch when master != staging, so please avoid committing
new patches to staging now to let maste
Hi Jan,
On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are hav
>>> On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Is this:
>>>
>>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
>>>
>>>
>>> being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)?
>>
>> I mis
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
>>
>> Is this:
>>
>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen
Hi Boris,
On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we ar
On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged.
Is this:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html
being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)?
-boris
>
> I would like to make ano
Hi all,
We haven't branch due to some regressions found during the week-end.
Meanwhile an RC has been cut and staging has been re-opened.
Please CC me on any patch going to Xen 4.9.
Cheers,
staging is now re-opened. We haven't branch due to some
On 19/05/17 15:56, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all
Julien Grall writes ("Commit moratorium to staging"):
> It looks like osstest is a bit behind because of ARM64 boxes (they are
> fully loaded) and XP testing (they now have been removed see [1]).
>
> I'd like to cut the next rc when staging == master, so please stop
> committing today.
I force
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> > At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
> > xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
> >
> > Please don't commit anything until I'
George Dunlap writes ("Re: Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Perhaps we can use the same model as I think we used last time,
> > with the person committing to unstable being responsible to also
> > put things applicable to 4.7 there? And with that de
On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote:
>> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
>>> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
>>> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>>>
>>> Please don't commit anyth
>>> On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
>> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
>> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>>
>> Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later
>>
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"):
> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that
> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches.
>
> Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later
> today.
I have now finished this branchin
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:37:14PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Wei,
>
> It seems like rc4 is about due, but you are away.
>
> So in anticipation of you getting back and wanting to cut rc4 ASAP we
> discussed on IRC and decided to institute a commit moratorium from ~now so
> that on Monday when y
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:01 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Committers,
> >
> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging
> > now
> > to let mast
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Committers,
>
> Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
> when
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 14:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy
> > > with
> > > that one-liner applied today.
> >
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with
> > that one-liner applied today.
>
> I will do so.
>
> If we are having a push to staging anyway then
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with
> that one-liner applied today.
I will do so.
If we are having a push to staging anyway then I also have these candidates
in my folder:
tools/xen-access: use PRI_xen
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:08:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> >> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> >> > master != stagin
>>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
>> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
>> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
>> > to let ma
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> > to let master catch up with staging. Another anno
>>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote:
> Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when
> master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now
> to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made
> when the moratorium is lifted.
Hmm, I think
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for 4.6rc1"):
> Please avoid committing anything just now. We need the push gate
> clear for a patch to update the tools library sonames, which is needed
> for rc1.
staging is now open for committing again. But, note that Wei (with RM
hat on) has asked that
49 matches
Mail list logo