Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-06 Thread George Dunlap
On 11/03/2017 06:35 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote: On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +0

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread Ian Jackson
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"): > Well, with a looping xen-build going on in the guest, I've done 40 local > migrates with no problems yet. > > But Roger -- is this on emulated devices only, no PV drivers? Yes. None of our Wi

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread Juergen Gross
On 03/11/17 19:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote: > Hmm. I wonder whethe

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:57:52PM +, George Dunlap wrote: > On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote: > >>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the mig

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread George Dunlap
On 11/03/2017 02:52 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On 11/03/2017 02:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:55:11AM +, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> Hmm. I wonder whether the guest is actually healthy after the migrate. One >>> could imagine a situation where the storage device model

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread George Dunlap
Kurth >>> ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall >>> ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel >> de...@lists.xenproject.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote: >>&

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel > de...@lists.xenproject.org> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging > > > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:20:10AM +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Roger Pau Monne

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-02 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 02/11/17 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote: Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"): Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock master (and other tree I mentioned). I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way because I base eac

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging [and 1 more messages]

2017-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"): > Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock > master (and other tree I mentioned). I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way because I base each force push on a test report - so it won't be

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging"): > Is there anyway to get that from windows in an automatic way? If not I > could test that with a Debian guest. In fact it might even be a good > thing for Linux based guest to be added to the regular m

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread George Dunlap
On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in > the osstest db by me) have determined: > > * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is > to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it, > then

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 02 November 2017 09:42 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth > ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall > ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel de...@lists.xenproject.org> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit mo

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread Roger Pau Monné
rrant ; > > committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 02 November 2017 09:15 > To: Roger Pau Monne > Cc: Ian Jackson ; Lars Kurth > ; Wei Liu ; Julien Grall > ; Paul Durrant ; > committ...@xenproject.org; xen-devel > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-02 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 04:17:10PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > * Affected hosts differ from unaffected hosts according to cpuid. > > Roger has repro'd the bug on an unaffected host by masking out > > certain cpuid bits. There

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, On 11/01/2017 04:54 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"): Hi Ian, Thank you for the detailed e-mail. On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be effective in the following sen

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"): > Hi Ian, > > Thank you for the detailed e-mail. > > On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Furthermore, the test is not intermittent, so a force push will be > > effective in the following sense: we would only get a "spurious" pas

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in > the osstest db by me) have determined: > > * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is > to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then mi

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Ian, Thank you for the detailed e-mail. On 11/01/2017 02:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in the osstest db by me) have determined: * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is to boot the Windows guest, save

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Ian Jackson
So, investigations (mostly by Roger, and also a bit of archaeology in the osstest db by me) have determined: * This bug is 100% reproducible on affected hosts. The repro is to boot the Windows guest, save/restore it, then migrate it, then shut down. (This is from an IRL conversation with Rog

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > Sent: 01 November 2017 10:48 > To: Roger Pau Monne > Cc: Julien Grall ; committ...@xenproject.org; xen- > devel ; Lars Kurth ; > Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu > Subject: Re: Commit moratorium to staging > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-11-01 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:52:37PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > I have to admit I have no idea why Windows clears the STS power bit > and then completely ignores it on certain occasions. > > I'm also afraid I have no idea how to debug Windows in order to know > why this event is acknowledged

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-10-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49:35AM +, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi all, > > Master lags 15 days behind staging due to tests failing reliably on some of > the hardware in osstest (see [1]). > > At the moment a force push is not feasible because the same tests passes on > different hardware (see [2

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-06-06 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.06.17 at 19:57, wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote: >>> On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote: On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > Is this: > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-06-01 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote: On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote: On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote: On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: Is this: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html being deferred to the next RC (if we are having

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-30 Thread Julien Grall
On 25/05/17 16:54, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged. I would like to make another attempt to branch with the RC (4.9 RC7). I don't want to branch when master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now to let maste

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-26 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Jan, On 26/05/17 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote: On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote: On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote: On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: Is this: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html being deferred to the next RC (if we are hav

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-25 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.05.17 at 20:00, wrote: > On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> Is this: >>> >>> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html >>> >>> >>> being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)? >> >> I mis

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-25 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 05/25/2017 01:46 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged. >> >> Is this: >> >> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-25 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Boris, On 25/05/17 18:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged. Is this: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html being deferred to the next RC (if we ar

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-25 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 05/25/2017 11:54 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > The patches fixing the 2 outstanding regressions have been merged. Is this: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-05/msg02340.html being deferred to the next RC (if we are having one)? -boris > > I would like to make ano

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching Xen 4.9

2017-05-22 Thread Julien Grall
Hi all, We haven't branch due to some regressions found during the week-end. Meanwhile an RC has been cut and staging has been re-opened. Please CC me on any patch going to Xen 4.9. Cheers, staging is now re-opened. We haven't branch due to some On 19/05/17 15:56, Julien Grall wrote: Hi all

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging

2017-05-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Commit moratorium to staging"): > It looks like osstest is a bit behind because of ARM64 boxes (they are > fully loaded) and XP testing (they now have been removed see [1]). > > I'd like to cut the next rc when staging == master, so please stop > committing today. I force

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching 4.7

2016-06-07 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"): > > At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that > > xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches. > > > > Please don't commit anything until I'

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching 4.7

2016-06-07 Thread Ian Jackson
George Dunlap writes ("Re: Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"): > On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Perhaps we can use the same model as I think we used last time, > > with the person committing to unstable being responsible to also > > put things applicable to 4.7 there? And with that de

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching 4.7

2016-06-07 Thread George Dunlap
On 07/06/16 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote: >> Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"): >>> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that >>> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches. >>> >>> Please don't commit anyth

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching 4.7

2016-06-07 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 07.06.16 at 15:55, wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"): >> At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that >> xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches. >> >> Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later >>

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for branching 4.7

2016-06-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for branching 4.7"): > At Wei's request, I am starting to branch the tree, so that > xen-unstable can diverge from the *-4.7 preparation branches. > > Please don't commit anything until I'm done, which will be later > today. I have now finished this branchin

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for possible rc4

2015-09-24 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:37:14PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Wei, > > It seems like rc4 is about due, but you are away. > > So in anticipation of you getting back and wanting to cut rc4 ASAP we > discussed on IRC and decided to institute a commit moratorium from ~now so > that on Monday when y

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 11:01 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > Committers, > > > > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when > > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging > > now > > to let mast

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-07 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 05:25:17PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > Committers, > > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now > to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made > when

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 14:19 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy > > > with > > > that one-liner applied today. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with > > that one-liner applied today. > > I will do so. > > If we are having a push to staging anyway then

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:12 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > But this point is moot since I said in the other email I was happy with > that one-liner applied today. I will do so. If we are having a push to staging anyway then I also have these candidates in my folder: tools/xen-access: use PRI_xen

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:08:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote: > >> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when > >> > master != stagin

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 04.09.15 at 13:52, wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote: >> > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when >> > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now >> > to let ma

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:44:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote: > > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when > > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now > > to let master catch up with staging. Another anno

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium

2015-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.09.15 at 18:25, wrote: > Xen tree is going to branch at 4.6 RC3. I don't want to branch when > master != staging, so please avoid committing new patches to staging now > to let master catch up with staging. Another announcement will be made > when the moratorium is lifted. Hmm, I think

Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium for 4.6rc1

2015-08-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Commit moratorium for 4.6rc1"): > Please avoid committing anything just now. We need the push gate > clear for a patch to update the tools library sonames, which is needed > for rc1. staging is now open for committing again. But, note that Wei (with RM hat on) has asked that