>>> On 09.09.15 at 10:56, wrote:
On 08.09.15 at 15:21, wrote:
>> I got Xen booting now with VT-d enabled, lot's of errors and the system is
>> unstable. xl dmesg output:
>
> Lots of errors? I don't see much - can you point out the errors you see?
> There are two interesting things:
>
>> (X
>>> On 09.09.15 at 19:02, wrote:
> Well, now the system is booting but would you have any idea why the system
> only boots with iommu=verbose,debug but not with iommu=1? If I pass iommu=1
> as a boot parameter it fails detecting SATA drives (AHCI) with "ata1.00:
> failed command: IDENTIFY DEVICE"
Hi,
I thought that some of those verbose logging notifications were errors like
for example "traps.c:2685:d0v10 Domain attempted WRMSR"
Well, now the system is booting but would you have any idea why the system
only boots with iommu=verbose,debug but not with iommu=1? If I pass iommu=1
as a boot
>>> On 08.09.15 at 15:21, wrote:
> I got Xen booting now with VT-d enabled, lot's of errors and the system is
> unstable. xl dmesg output:
Lots of errors? I don't see much - can you point out the errors you see?
There are two interesting things:
> (XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1149: drhd->address = fbffd0
Hi,
I got Xen booting now with VT-d enabled, lot's of errors and the system is
unstable. xl dmesg output:
Xen 4.6.0-rc
(XEN) Xen version 4.6.0-rc (r...@easyanticheat.net) (gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10)
4.9.2) debug=y Mon Sep 7 20:46:47 EEST 2015
(XEN) Latest ChangeSet: Fri Aug 28 16:01:55 2015 +0100 hg
>>> On 08.09.15 at 15:12, wrote:
> Sorry about that, I'm using gmail and misclicked reply instead of
> reply-all. No Idea how to fix the line wrapping though.
>
> Any ideas how to enable IOMMU in vanilla kernel? I checked from kernel
> documentation that the parameters are intel_iommu=on and iomm
Hi,
Sorry about that, I'm using gmail and misclicked reply instead of
reply-all. No Idea how to fix the line wrapping though.
Any ideas how to enable IOMMU in vanilla kernel? I checked from kernel
documentation that the parameters are intel_iommu=on and iommu=force and
they were passed as a boot
>>> On 07.09.15 at 20:28, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:45:20PM +0300, Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote:
>>I'm happy to help to debug this further if needed, but so far I'm not able
>>to boot the system at all without iommu=0 boot parameter.
>>
>
> It'd be helpful if you could use a serial
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:45:20PM +0300, Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote:
>Hi,
>
Hi,
>I'm using a Asus X99-A motherboard with latest bios which in paper (and in
>BIOS) supports VT-d. However, with Xen 4.5.1 and Xen unstable the VT-d
>fails completely on SATA AHCI with "failed to IDENTI
