Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 102519: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 23.11.16 at 10:49, wrote: > The invlpg logic isn't (or is no longer) squashing segmentation faults. > > I can't recall whether you backported the change that far, but it looks > as if the test might accidentally been relying on XSA-191 to function on > older versions of Xen. That change d

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 102519: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-23 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 23/11/2016 09:43, Jan Beulich wrote: On 23.11.16 at 05:11, wrote: >> flight 102519 xen-4.6-testing real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102519/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 102519: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 23.11.16 at 05:11, wrote: > flight 102519 xen-4.6-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102519/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 20 xtf/test-hvm32-i