On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:14:14AM +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8 June 2016 at 00:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:01:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Wei Chen writes ("[RFC v2] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for
> >> head.S"):
> >> > In current Xen build rules,
Hi,
On 8 June 2016 at 00:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:01:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Wei Chen writes ("[RFC v2] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for
>> head.S"):
>> > In current Xen build rules, the build system will only check the
>> > dependencies in current folde
On 7 June 2016 at 21:18, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:34:43PM +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
>> In current Xen build rules, the build system will only check the
>> dependencies in current folder and obj-y generated dependencies
>> in other folder.
>>
>> But Makefile may add so
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:01:35PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Chen writes ("[RFC v2] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S"):
> > In current Xen build rules, the build system will only check the
> > dependencies in current folder and obj-y generated dependencies
> > in other folder.
Wei Chen writes ("[RFC v2] xen/arm: build: add missed dependency for head.S"):
> In current Xen build rules, the build system will only check the
> dependencies in current folder and obj-y generated dependencies
> in other folder.
>
> But Makefile may add some objects to ALL_OBJS. These objects ma
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:34:43PM +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> In current Xen build rules, the build system will only check the
> dependencies in current folder and obj-y generated dependencies
> in other folder.
>
> But Makefile may add some objects to ALL_OBJS. These objects may
> be not in the sam
